Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on duplicated streams

I support adoption. The drafts look like a good starting point though it
seems these two proposals could be combined into a single draft if desired.
I assume there's a reason they've been separated.

Kevin Gross
+1-303-447-0517
Media Network Consultant
AVA Networks - www.AVAnw.com <http://www.avanw.com/>, www.X192.org

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Miguel A. Garcia <
Miguel.A.Garcia@ericsson.com> wrote:

> At the last IETF meeting we had presentation of two drafts, both
> related to the expression of duplicated streams in SDP. We noticed
> there was support to progress these drafts. These drafts are
> complementary to work going on in AVTEXT, where there is a normative
> dependency.
>
> These are the documents:
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/**doc/draft-begen-mmusic-**
> redundancy-grouping/<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-begen-mmusic-redundancy-grouping/>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/**doc/draft-begen-mmusic-**
> temporal-interleaving/<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-begen-mmusic-temporal-interleaving/>
>
> We would like to poll the working group for adopting these two
> documents as WG items, once we get approved milestones.
>
> Please indicate whether you support or not this new work within the
> next 5 working days.
>
> Flemming and Miguel (co-chairs).
>
> /Miguel
> --
> Miguel A. Garcia
> +34-91-339-3608
> Ericsson Spain
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/mmusic<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>
>