Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on duplicated streams

[Colin Perkins <[e-mail]>]

Flemming,

We need these to support our rtp-duplication draft, so I'm in favour.

Colin


On 28 Sep 2012, at 14:16, Flemming Andreasen wrote:
> MMUSIC and AVTEXT folks
> 
> It is our understanding that AVTEXT is conducting work that depends on the below two drafts, and hence MMUSIC is considering adopting them as WG items. The MMUSIC chairs issued a WG poll for adoption of the drafts, however we have not received much feedback on this. Please take a minute to indicate if you are in favor of (or against) adopting these drafts as MMUSIC WG items. 
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> -- Flemming & Miguel (MMUSIC co-chairs). 
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:	WG Poll for consensus on duplicated streams
> Date:	Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:18:31 +0200
> From:	Miguel A. Garcia <[e-mail]>
> To:	mmusic <[e-mail]>, Flemming Andreasen <[e-mail]>
> 
> At the last IETF meeting we had presentation of two drafts, both
> related to the expression of duplicated streams in SDP. We noticed
> there was support to progress these drafts. These drafts are
> complementary to work going on in AVTEXT, where there is a normative
> dependency.
> 
> These are the documents:
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-begen-mmusic-redundancy-grouping/
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-begen-mmusic-temporal-interleaving/
> 
> We would like to poll the working group for adopting these two
> documents as WG items, once we get approved milestones.
> 
> Please indicate whether you support or not this new work within the
> next 5 working days.
> 
> Flemming and Miguel (co-chairs).
> 
> /Miguel
> -- 
> Miguel A. Garcia
> [phone]
> Ericsson Spain

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/