[MMUSIC] Questions/Comments on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bwparam-03.txt

I have a few questions and comments on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bwparam-03.txt:

1. Page 9, the last few lines - What is the difference between 'RTP-based media  
   stream' and 'RTP transport' here? It's not very clear when the session level  
   TIAS value can be used.

2. Section 6.2.3, 2nd paragraph - it would be good to clarify that this entire 
   paragraph refers to the media level values.
   This paragraph is a little confusing to read..it might help to mention
   explicitly that it is RECOMMENDED to use both the AS and TIAS fields;
   AS for backwards compatibility, older implementations would ignore the TIAS 
   field; TIAS would be recognized by newer and compliant implementations,
   which must ignore the AS value.

3. 6.3, 2nd paragraph - here too it might help clarity to assert the 'MUST NOT' 
   case , before the 'MAY' case.

4. 6.3, is there any ambiguity in the last paragraph? For instance, is it ok to
   *not* have maxprate if one or the other of TIAS or the max packet rate 
   for the transport is not available?

5. It would be great to have a complete example of SDP using TIAS and maxprate
   attributes.   

thanks
geetha

internet: geetha.srikantan@sun.com

> To: mmusic@ietf.org
> cc: jo@tzi.uni-bremen.de
> From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
> Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 09:01:32 -0400
> Subject: [MMUSIC] WG last call: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bwparam-03.txt
> X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, 
<mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
> List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
> List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, 
<mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
> 
> This is to announce a working group last call on the Transport Independent
> Bandwidth Modifier for SDP <draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bwparam-03.txt>. Please
> send any final comments on this draft to the mailing list by Friday, 13th
> June 2003. If no substantive issues are raised by that time, we propose to
> ask the IESG to publish this as a Proposed Standard RFC.
> 
> -- 
> Colin Perkins
> http://csperkins.org/
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic