IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] WGLC for latest set of changes in RTSP 2.0 (draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-35)

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Thu, 12 September 2013 12:18 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E310211E8166 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 05:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.754
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.754 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DQjey1NUhD2M for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 05:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173BE21F9DAF for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 05:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7fcf8e0000062b8-4f-5231b0f88a6e
Received: from ESESSHC004.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 1B.D8.25272.8F0B1325; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:18:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.148) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:18:00 +0200
Message-ID: <5231B124.60408@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:18:44 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
References: <522E1F94.1090804@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <522E1F94.1090804@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje7PDYZBBku2MFpc2z2FyeL9BV2L qcsfszgwe0z5vZHVY8mSn0weXy5/ZgtgjuKySUnNySxLLdK3S+DK+Px1GUvBGoGKvtZVrA2M W3i7GDk5JARMJP7seMQOYYtJXLi3nq2LkYtDSOAoo8TSNV/BEkICyxklXm9nA7F5BTQlbv5a ywRiswioSvz+v54RxGYTsJC4+aMRrEZUIFiifftXqHpBiZMzn7B0MXJwiAhoS0xdYAESZhao lmjomsYCYgsLJEk8PvidGWKVhsTJY0fAbE6gVb3bzjFB3CYpsW3RMXaIXj2JKVdbGCFseYnm rbOherUlGpo6WCcwCs1CsnkWkpZZSFoWMDKvYuQoTi1Oyk03MtjECAzeg1t+W+xgvPzX5hCj NAeLkjjvFr0zgUIC6YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmpxYcYmTg4pRoYbSqOMtu/1c6WeyN42X9BhfNJ l4hPZXcOx7r2SK6yeliZwXPnJM+bfsvpFjzLLn9d/epEW931NYcXzJDc3mL8JmHnjL6lsVne vja5k34fEborKBEWydi4WOpK4d7eeBfe2CSPypnVodeKuoxVGVT5ztfpmm1U6V32OuDk5XVT brNsOfTkwZJTSizFGYmGWsxFxYkArnwcdiwCAAA=
Cc: "draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis@tools.ietf.org>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] WGLC for latest set of changes in RTSP 2.0 (draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-35)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:18:21 -0000

WG,

Christian Groves sent me a question regarding the usage of RFC 2822
format in the Date, Expires, If-Modified-Since, Last-Modified and
Retry-After headers. I hadn't changed this despite being somewhat aware
of the fact that this specification used a obsoleted RFC as normative
reference. However, his question made be recheck the differences in
format between RFC 2822 and RFC 5322 and although the formulation of the
syntax description has been changed, I think the actual syntax is
untouched. Thus I suggest we update the reference to use RFC 5322
section 3.3.

Any objections to this?

Cheers

Magnus

On 2013-09-09 21:20, Flemming Andreasen wrote:
> Greetings
> 
> Following WGLC and a few additional updates and maling list discussions
> subsequently, we requested publication of 2326bis-34. As a result of the
> IESG and Gen-Art review, several updates have been made to the document
> and we are hereby issuing a 2-week WGLC for those changes to give the WG
> participants a chance to review them as well. If you have any comments
> on the changes between -34 and -35, please make sure to send those to
> the mailing list and the authors no later than Monday September 23, 2013.
> 
> The relevant diff-file can be accessed at:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-34&difftype=--html&submit=Go%21&url2=draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-35
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -- Ari & Flemming (MMUSIC co-chairs)
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> 
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email