IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] WGLC for latest set of changes in RTSP 2.0 (draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-35)

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Tue, 24 September 2013 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B2211E8109 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 01:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.686
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.563, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QC9Koom9ejSM for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 01:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA38D11E80D3 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 01:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f738e000003ee3-97-52414ebfd05e
Received: from ESESSHC009.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 4A.AB.16099.FBE41425; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:35:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.20) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:35:11 +0200
Message-ID: <52414EE6.1040602@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:35:50 +0300
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
References: <522E1F94.1090804@cisco.com> <5231B124.60408@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <5231B124.60408@ericsson.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre5+P8cgg5M/rC2u7Z7CZPH+gq7F 1OWPWRyYPab83sjqsWTJTyaPL5c/swUwR3HZpKTmZJalFunbJXBlPDzKV3BPqGLShFnMDYzz +LsYOTgkBEwkVm0I7GLkBDLFJC7cW8/WxcjFISRwmFHix563UM4yRok/72+xgFTxCmhLzHv8 lgnEZhFQldjWcYAZxGYTsJC4+aORDcQWFQiWaN/+lQ2iXlDi5MwnYL0iAjISezdtZgYZyizQ wyixsv0z2CBhgSSJxwe/gw0SEnCTmDRjCgvIdZwCWhKXfupDXCcpsW3RMXYQm1lAT2LK1RZG CFteonnrbKhWbYmGpg7WCYxCs5CsnoWkZRaSlgWMzKsY2XMTM3PSyw03MQJD9+CW37o7GE+d EznEKM3BoiTOu0nvTKCQQHpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOavEhRiYOTqkGxtLM3iTpax6v+r1s/eRW O/K/ud79On/m1U0nKxyOrXkm0MZynDX90eKw5zcvX9r/xWLGW+W782/Y/ff8+69BWTjqm9uW QJ6Q3rKQ4DfyvIfrzi1xm/qHI978SMzkL++sF37SY7V51LTY+b1XQ8XtzJeLP0+sWff/lcBq BdvVpdsOZ524tUaYXU6JpTgj0VCLuag4EQDzcY6mKwIAAA==
Cc: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] WGLC for latest set of changes in RTSP 2.0 (draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-35)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:35:18 -0000

WG,

I have updated the draft to change from RFC 2822 to RFC 5322 for the
date format. With this change I believed to have addressed all
outstanding issues.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund


On 2013-09-12 15:18, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> WG,
> 
> Christian Groves sent me a question regarding the usage of RFC 2822
> format in the Date, Expires, If-Modified-Since, Last-Modified and
> Retry-After headers. I hadn't changed this despite being somewhat aware
> of the fact that this specification used a obsoleted RFC as normative
> reference. However, his question made be recheck the differences in
> format between RFC 2822 and RFC 5322 and although the formulation of the
> syntax description has been changed, I think the actual syntax is
> untouched. Thus I suggest we update the reference to use RFC 5322
> section 3.3.
> 
> Any objections to this?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Magnus
> 
> On 2013-09-09 21:20, Flemming Andreasen wrote:
>> Greetings
>>
>> Following WGLC and a few additional updates and maling list discussions
>> subsequently, we requested publication of 2326bis-34. As a result of the
>> IESG and Gen-Art review, several updates have been made to the document
>> and we are hereby issuing a 2-week WGLC for those changes to give the WG
>> participants a chance to review them as well. If you have any comments
>> on the changes between -34 and -35, please make sure to send those to
>> the mailing list and the authors no later than Monday September 23, 2013.
>>
>> The relevant diff-file can be accessed at:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-34&difftype=--html&submit=Go%21&url2=draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-35
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -- Ari & Flemming (MMUSIC co-chairs)
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email