Re: [MMUSIC] ICE candidate address selection update draft

[Simon Perreault <[e-mail]>]

Le 2012-08-01 16:35, Ari Keranen a écrit :
> And the draft here:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-keranen-mmusic-ice-address-selection-01
>
> Give the doc a quick read if you already haven't (it's only couple of
> pages), let us know if there's something to fix, and if you think it's a
> good idea, feel free to +1 for WG adoption.

+1 for WG adoption

I just read the draft. It's simple, it makes sense, and it fixes a real 
bug in the ICE spec.

One comment:

>    o  Candidate addresses from Unique Local Addresses (ULAs) MUST NOT be
>       combined with any other candidates except other ULA candidates.

That would fail if you're behind an NPTv6 thingie that maps the ULA to a 
global prefix. So maybe remove that rule.

>    o  Local relayed candidates MUST NOT be combined with remote host
>       candidates from IPv4 private address space [RFC1918] or IPv6 link-
>       local addresses or ULAs.

Same comment here about the "or ULAs" part.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca