Re: [MMUSIC] ICE candidate address selection update draft

[Simon Perreault <[e-mail]>]

Le 2012-08-03 11:58, Ari Keranen a écrit :
> Yes, you should not get ULAs from the STUN server as long as the STUN
> server is properly located (on the Internet, outside of the organization
> perimeter and on the other side of any NATs). And the peer reflexive
> candidate (which would be global address) can be then matched with
> peer's globals.

But reflexive candidates don't always work. I know I said NPTv6, but we 
shouldn't prevent ICE from working behind evil NAT66. And an ICE client 
may not be able to reach a STUN server so you can't rely on having 
reflexive candidates. So you should still try to match ULAs with globals.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca