Re: [MMUSIC] Interactions between POFs, PANs and 3264 Offer/Answers

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 16 August 2013 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5B711E8111 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wZfRs4ROGq1O for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B8011E825A for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7f9a8e000005620-49-520dd1f0fd4f
Received: from ESESSHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 3C.5A.22048.0F1DD025; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:17:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.92]) by ESESSHC005.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.33]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:17:04 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] Interactions between POFs, PANs and 3264 Offer/Answers
Thread-Index: Ac6SwAaH+8B2wVyxQFSEGu6rKTxpcQFp3RKAAHouH+A=
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:17:02 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C44E4EE@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C41EC88@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113678D89@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113678D89@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: fi-FI
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.146]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre7Hi7xBBr++sVl0TGazmLr8MYsD k8eU3xtZPZYs+ckUwBTFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlfH45STGgs0sFb8v9TA3MO5m7mLk5JAQMJHY desWC4QtJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBw4wSn+6uZYdwFjNKbJx1Hsjh4GATsJDo/qcN0iAiYCjRtGce E4jNLCAjMeNsI5gtLOAjMfXbckaQchEBX4nzU2ogTCuJS+9iQSpYBFQlZi3oZwWxeYEqLnX9 glo7gVFi8cVr7CAJTpDWjvdsIDYj0G3fT62BWiUu8eHgdaj7BSSW7DkPZYtKvHz8jxXCVpL4 seESC0S9jsSC3Z/YIGxtiWULXzNDLBaUODnzCcsERrFZSMbOQtIyC0nLLCQtCxhZVjGy5yZm 5qSXm29iBMbHwS2/DXYwbrovdohRmoNFSZx3s96ZQCGB9MSS1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTByc Ug2MKVO+Rjp93OLE8Oju/rA890lTdkWlvSizeFece1gy7rZMc8KtZR8V1ycxW61r3nJfLCDQ nd355L3bG1dbGEz+1HvM1/TRisY+i55dsQdM1Lofrbo+K2fp1iv7b0vYVp0+Ofn8SvZI7mPH bW4Wdc+JOTJ58dbm222+JZPui6tuOb0y5NlBq0hfOyWW4oxEQy3mouJEACvJWeldAgAA
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Interactions between POFs, PANs and 3264 Offer/Answers
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:17:13 -0000

Hi,
 
>> It has been indicated that POFs (partial offers) and PANs (partial answers) form a stand-alone mechanism, instead of being an extension of RFC3264.
>
> uh, I don't think so. THey seem sot be an optional extension to 3264

Well, that is not what was indicated during the meeting (if we don't count Hadriel :)...

Anyway, I guess that is part of the solution discussions. But, whatever it's an extension or not, I don't think it changes the fact that there will interactions between POF/PANs and 3264 O/As.

Regards,

Christer