IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] [clue] ICE, ICE-bis, and Cluster 238

Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com> Fri, 07 September 2018 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBD5130DF7 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MYP6X2F6pe9v for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26044130DDA for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d4-v6so7514463pfn.0 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=5+l+h4Kkb9SvkyUAxZa29pzTRhiJ6ES5UqOqrFmyfrQ=; b=YuXkCpWuQ0LpDcY/Ls6LsVxH3ml+gY3nPiWzqjc3iV3j21hWmWmEbBQunyOa9XJz/x 7EHAm5KzMmiDHcUqm5ai0G9PVh9GXNJRcwyyfNuynTRIHYOXMnQT6BVrmXhzf2SMWsJ2 fCei3opLMIFQLD9P5uxD1r7D2Kk4lv1iCwBFc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=5+l+h4Kkb9SvkyUAxZa29pzTRhiJ6ES5UqOqrFmyfrQ=; b=cmDD1/OttqwFaxwKLMZ2TTCu3VAvaAgldMwC2Wu7JVhLM3ss9erBMynZ/cCzMJlbr2 ui7IzyQQBSrTVWqWfZOg+lq8viFUS6MPU9YAOCTeZG8J9gwVyC4tuw/3+tVV9JnsAwY4 By1wLDf1oLx5qtgCsOSxvIGi1jDwwS2P2ail1IHBKNZaLmardQglvP+xIQMpXA4Wmiwn n9n5BYbVrWk2YjZQUf8PPzD6/SUfY6aoYSC+3MKeVYjjUjBbtUkeWpR4wC3kKOatWLJ+ npG5Kbiu/RbKYRkKVrqffZsKOBc5ikNm4zGF6Wy4MnpVSieu7u6g6tDQJUAMvu4WKoZT xK7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CvyF+ZIRtsLRElXle/NnElf+F8s6Spd1ZHFXELePlFj2j/W11c C4cOTuy8AHfhOj1LaRRjJ7wn2w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdac4HoWm0BMwrYwJK58TNRCiUxJTPzHLab/USUOyFbz7163dgZ3BRe2oN6IFbyXWc6W+Dqt0g==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:6711:: with SMTP id b17-v6mr10456115pfc.243.1536350473636; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4600:3f31:f1b4:fa2c:dab4:bde9? ([2601:647:4600:3f31:f1b4:fa2c:dab4:bde9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c78-v6sm12260430pfc.188.2018.09.07.13.01.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
Message-Id: <81680B8E-5F4D-4146-851A-36649E1AAAA2@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D0D594AE-AECF-4650-B2FA-A33012ACD88E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:01:09 -0700
In-Reply-To: <7D1A35C5-FF09-4F93-ABA8-74D877952EF0@iii.ca>
Cc: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art@ietf.org>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "clue@ietf.org" <clue@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "ice@ietf.org" <ice@ietf.org>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
References: <15d3b114-5c04-61c4-8a62-61d8a414143d@nostrum.com> <7D1A35C5-FF09-4F93-ABA8-74D877952EF0@iii.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/6G1698Z79b9TXrNLZTkynpKS6mo>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] [clue] ICE, ICE-bis, and Cluster 238
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 20:01:16 -0000


> On Sep 6, 2018, at 13:24, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Cisco has implemented stuff that is WebRTC 1.0 compliant without this change. These gratuitous changes, years after the implementation were coded, with no real benefit will ensure that we are not and will not become compliant with the RFC. It's unlikely we will upgrade to the new ICE until it has real befits. It is doubtful Justin will want to implement the 8445 mechanisms of supporting both new and old ICE. Instead, we will move to say "works with Browser X version Y or later.”

Obviously I’m not Justin.
But the current plan for Firefox is to implement support for 8845 some time in 2019 and then have support for 5245 and 8845 going forward.

Best regards
  Nils Ohlmeier

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email