Re: [MMUSIC] [clue] [rtcweb] [Ice] [art] ICE, ICE-bis, and Cluster 238

We are taking a few other outstanding issues as part of this rev
(potentially including https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/jsep/issues/843 which
you noted), so I think a new LC is warranted.

Aiming for a new doc version on Monday.

On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 2:52 AM Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> Personally I don't think updating of references and examples require a new
> IETF last call.
>
>
> Do people foresee any changes to the technical JSEP procedures due to the
> reference update?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Christer
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* clue <clue-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Sergio Garcia Murillo <
> sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 13, 2018 12:22 PM
> *To:* Adam Roach
> *Cc:* mmusic@ietf.org; art@ietf.org; Heather Flanagan (RFC Series
> Editor); clue@ietf.org; pthatcher=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org;
> ice@ietf.org; RTCWeb IETF; Justin Uberti
> *Subject:* Re: [clue] [rtcweb] [MMUSIC] [Ice] [art] ICE, ICE-bis, and
> Cluster 238
>
> p0090
>
> El lun., 1 oct. 2018 23:11, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com
> <adam@nostrum..com>> escribió:
>
> On 9/27/18 6:20 PM, Justin Uberti wrote:
> > I agree with Peter. Chrome's implementation is already closer to 8445
> > than 5245, so I don't see any issues associated with snapping this
> > cluster to 8445 (aside from the work involved).
> >
> > On that topic, note that JSEP will need a few more changes than just
> > the addition of the 8445 reference and note; the examples will have to
> > be updated, as will the logic regarding generation of offers and
> > answers and their parsing (to deal with the new ice-option). These
> > changes will be modest but probably will need to be done by the authors.
>
>
> If I read what you're saying correctly, it sounds like you're talking
> about changes that are significant enough that we'll have to put JSEP
> through IETF last call and through the IESG again. That being the case,
> and the rest of the cluster being so close to done, I'd really prefer to
> see this done very soon, if such changes are required. When do you
> believe such an update could be available?
>
> I've copied the RFC Series Editor on this note for her awareness.
>
> /a
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>