Re: [MMUSIC] FW: [rtcweb] How to signal RTX SSRCs with simulcast

[Peter Thatcher <[e-mail]>]

RSIDs on source streams and RRIDs on repair streams make sense.

While we included the ability to have RSIDs on repair streams into the
header extensions, I don't see any use for them in the SDP and calling them
"a=rid" is just confusing.  If anything, they should be called something
else, like "a=rsid".  But again, I don't see any point.

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 9:35 AM Bernard Aboba <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Currently the WebRTC API only exposes RIDs used for media streams, not for
> redundancy streams and JSEP currently doesn't indicate whether it is
> permitted for redundancy streams to have their own RIDs.
>
> So adding this text creates a potential ambiguity.
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Adam Roach <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Future-proofness.
>>
>> Recall that the original design here was to give redundancy streams the
>> same ID as the stream they're repairing, but there were objections that
>> doing so would preclude using the mechanism to talk about redundancy
>> streams in SDP if such a need ever arose in the future. So, we allow for
>> signaling of these IDs in SDP, but (since as you correctly point out there
>> are no concrete use cases at the moment) do not require it.
>>
>> You seem to think this is a problem. Can you describe a scenario in which
>> it causes interop issues or additional implementation complexity?
>>
>> /a
>>
>>
>> On 7/26/17 11:21, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>>
>> Why would a redundancy RTP stream have an "a=rid" line of its own?  I am
>> struggling to find a use case for this.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Bo Burman <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>> To follow up on this, I suggest making the following addition to
>>> draft-ietf-mmusic-rid:
>>>
>>> ---- AFTER this text in section 4 ----
>>>
>>>    An "a=rid" SDP media attribute specifies restrictions defining a
>>>    unique RTP payload configuration identified via the "rid-id" field.
>>>    This value binds the restriction to the RTP Stream identified by its
>>>    RTP Stream Identifier SDES item [I-D.ietf-avtext-rid].  To be clear,
>>>    implementations that use the "a=rid" parameter in SDP MUST support
>>>    the RtpStreamId SDES item described in [I-D.ietf-avtext-rid].  Such
>>>    implementations MUST send it for all streams in an SDP media
>>>    description ("m=") that have "a=rid" lines remaining after applying
>>>    the rules in Section 6 and its subsections.
>>>
>>> ---- ... add this proposed, new text ----
>>>
>>>    Implementations that use the "a=rid" parameter in SDP and that
>>>    make use of redundancy RTP streams [RFC7656], e.g. RTP RTX
>>>    [RFC4588] or FEC [RFC5109][I-D.ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme],
>>>    for any of the source RTP streams that have "a=rid" lines remaining
>>>    after applying the rules in Section 6 and its subsections, MUST
>>>    support and use RepairedRtpStreamId SDES item described in
>>>    [I-D.ietf-avtext-rid] for those redundancy RTP streams. This provides
>>>    the binding between the source RTP stream and the corresponding
>>>    redundancy RTP stream, by setting RepairedRtpStreamId value for
>>>    the redundancy RTP stream to the RtpStreamId value of the source
>>>    RTP stream. The redundancy RTP stream MAY (but need not) have an
>>>    "a=rid" line of its own, in which case the RtpStreamId SDES item value
>>>    will be different from the corresponding source RTP stream.
>>>
>>> ---- End changes ----
>>>
>>> The -simulcast draft would be entirely agnostic to this clarification of
>>> "a=rid" and RepairedRtpStreamId usage and thereby transparently allow using
>>> redundancy RTP streams with simulcast.
>>>
>>> /Bo
>>> (as individual)
>>>
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Iñaki Baz Castillo [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>> > Sent: den 13 mars 2017 14:43
>>> > To: Bo Burman <[e-mail]>
>>> > Cc: mmusic ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Taylor Brandstetter (
>>> [e-mail])
>>> > <[e-mail]>; [e-mail];
>>> [e-mail]
>>> > Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] FW: [rtcweb] How to signal RTX SSRCs with
>>> simulcast
>>> >
>>> > 2017-03-13 14:41 GMT+01:00 Bo Burman <[e-mail]>:
>>> > > [BoB] Usage of RepairedRtpStreamId and RtpStreamId are already
>>> defined on RTP level by -avtext-rid. If we have
>>> > preferences on how to best use them with redundancy RTP streams in
>>> general, I suggest we add text to -mmusic-rid
>>> > about it. This would be regardless if we go for option A or B, but
>>> decided once and for all, thus applicable to RFC 4588 rtx
>>> > and FLEX-FEC alike.
>>> >
>>> > Agreed.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Iñaki Baz Castillo
>>> > <[e-mail]>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mmusic mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>