Re: [MMUSIC] Dummy ports

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Wed, 23 July 2014 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <emcho@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8151B29E8 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Rg7RPaBqywM for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77AC41B29E3 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a1so1815549wgh.23 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=L5h0EhuMNU9+NT//OWqh20BgjRSv/SMVy9ENL37IwJo=; b=gp8x17kKen/yKdUop6bpd4x1A5Dsf383JGZTPaSI2ICaIdo7FPF/4NVG8Ru3wlrNGX JsxQVS12z79Dqm8+GL1q/fUblHJxYZHLwHKY/vRVS016TXUoI7LUH6muh7EjhA3zXibV YzEDXHxco+Tfu94Ri8Jqft8vUUfo5DScOz+jZuB9g9R7yX+PIZpyZ4+YHlzFUozUuTOZ amYeIgoSD7uUbkoQ7jFMpf0z7jltJyx+blzE79NB2v5xXz3VMn8NK/AsgiX2SVDdSguP HsEh3iAaU/dA98y5BnsHDsXcxnW0pRpKUqpR0yaVtBJLX4wCZYYiNrmhEZoUIW/CW6zF fTrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmVUgiFUl2dDuCgZxR9+ke2qkSKqSNn+r3DuM6D/oSDR7gV/X3Q5hU0WBgk88jUHQVZJDqu
X-Received: by 10.194.205.132 with SMTP id lg4mr6484622wjc.80.1406155370090; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-97e2.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-97e2.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.151.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o12sm14781964wiw.5.2014.07.23.15.42.46 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53D03A64.303@jitsi.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 18:42:44 -0400
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBMC=SAVX1Ji71yg9bmbmoDFAeKkZER9gOVsFa51Jvk_HA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWTikckH=5=NfwJYdcfHjcOi5ggzhLR+=CVaXeACLcdKw@mail.gmail.com> <53B661C9.6090009@alvestrand.no> <53B713FC.5010507@alum.mit.edu> <53BA81A3.8090108@jitsi.org> <CAOJ7v-3ELY_Cm3-f3wWB8GHqGMrbFLRgxaUBqrSFm=9s9ZErpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXfzUEbpYkRwm5ZMAfxEQxDgaKNNvsjo3NvKAUc650HUQ@mail.gmail.com> <53C02A45.40703@jitsi.org> <CABkgnnWhKxx17NBpZNhKfHK3Aw1uqaa5eeR_ZbY7uMRd9XbuoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2q36Y2SGOZYpiFjgJO+wKVcpqQTo0f-0581Y8OY_EYvQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-2q36Y2SGOZYpiFjgJO+wKVcpqQTo0f-0581Y8OY_EYvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/F-sjocx_VFpigL6VuU4pXurFcw4
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Dummy ports
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 22:42:53 -0000

On 23.07.14, 15:49, Justin Uberti wrote:
> The JSEP authors discussed a bit more and agreed that using port 9s on
> all m= lines when doing full trickle is the right solution to this problem.

Great news! Then we are pretty much ready for WGLC.

Emil

>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Martin Thomson
> <martin.thomson@gmail.com <mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 11 July 2014 11:17, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org
>     <mailto:emcho@jitsi.org>> wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > On 11.07.14, 19:51, Martin Thomson wrote:
>      >>
>      >> On 11 July 2014 09:33, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com
>     <mailto:juberti@google.com>> wrote:
>      >>>
>      >>> a) We require unique 'dummy' ports in the initial trickle offer.
>      >>> b) We allow use of the same dummy port (9) in the initial
>     trickle offer.
>      >>> (This is what Chrome does, although it currently uses port 1).
>      >>>
>      >>> We had been leaning towards (a) based on the legacy equipment case
>      >>> mentioned
>      >>> above. However, if nobody can provide details on this case, I
>     agree we
>      >>> should end up with (b).
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> As a general rule, if accommodating legacy equipment is particularly
>      >> hard for us here, then we should leave the fixups needed for that
>      >> legacy equipment to application code.  This seems like a good
>      >> candidate for that.  It's not like non-9 ports will work with all
>      >> legacy equipment anyway.
>      >
>      > Also note that, in the case of trickle, port 9s would only occur
>     if the
>      > offerer expects (knows) it would be supported. In other cases it
>     would just
>      > do half trickle and the problem wouldn't exist.
>
>     Yeah, that's even more reason to do the right thing (as opposed to the
>     safe thing).
>
>

-- 
https://jitsi.org