IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-28: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 24 August 2017 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD94124B18; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xQQHi0hoXaEQ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9383120721; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.63] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v7OHm51x085040 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:48:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <aa248a72-9b32-f1bc-e9f8-8471303c7bae@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:48:05 -0500
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp@ietf.org>, "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>, Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8EB6BD4A-26A9-4F98-A57A-FCCFC3F6AC97@nostrum.com>
References: <150301038555.14103.1567567703984434290.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D5C324F2.201A9%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <aa248a72-9b32-f1bc-e9f8-8471303c7bae@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/Fcz10_4Q9rL7BbD4f0P7USxybNU>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-28: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 17:48:22 -0000

> On Aug 23, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> On 8/23/17 04:38, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>> 
>>> I would think the long-form title of this document should include "TLS,"
>>> to
>>> reflect that it also contains TLS-related procedures.
>> The issue is that the document doesn¹t really define the O/A procedures
>> for TLS. It simply adds the usage of the tls-id attribute to the existing
>> procedures defined elsewhere.
> 
> Right, so make that clear. I note that simply adding "and Identification of TLS Connections" to the end is ambiguous (since it makes it sound like it defines O/A for TLS), but you can fix this by reversing the existing title; e.g., something like: "Establishing Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Using the Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/Answer Mechanism and Identification of Transport Layer Security (TLS) Connections in SDP”

Wow, that’s petty cumbersome as a title—it’s pretty much an abstract. Does it need that much detail?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email