Re: [MMUSIC] Last chance to comment [Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-27.txt] - Text on ICE PAC
Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Mon, 20 May 2019 22:35 UTC
Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18D41200EA for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2019 15:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YrtBr_nyhvYs for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2019 15:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50CE81200A2 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2019 15:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id w22so7459856pgi.6 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2019 15:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=t9IlHFRVBCsasEr6QQBjo9jSsLcOXjOfXUl1bxGyxTA=; b=wXk9wFAywFStkBjR8JFSTc0kPUG8JihESS36JUfubjMIzZ3rbAq170yGyq34mtJ6iU IaylGb9XCfRmXN/fOPQ4cPKsXtnxMMEwP1jyGuZeSUmXXcxG9tiFG++iVIyHRfO6Y/OW kcv4Xy7M0IBvuFpnXsiq9bA1YJt8qn72TeBeDmmMfW/Tf7obG5T6m5h8TzvQEB/kqjpz kk7UrZHLf9/0R8iPR22wTb/KZgAtJH1wCR1RXzQda0fR1ydQ+9jYWJ7c+FK34MNoohEc I6z9o5h/ReEL8kXXPYh9IgrkHw8n433Dvc9/Z0dBvJHy0BxgPWiOsxDQGdUxmAd4lJYI h5Cw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t9IlHFRVBCsasEr6QQBjo9jSsLcOXjOfXUl1bxGyxTA=; b=sZuI7vKQd8Bdhn7cDrh2/ul+QHstmqxI0Yf6UIzhk9M7369RBKsSLFrGs7mKc1QLw+ QQavhTC58Ou7XxoQsf92jIpgxE/ba6g0GZDf6UGrlinRP0QCN8/RkP9cM/rc4sUt5nVv nTdq+2UVRo/WXEJ3WiH3s2ZqDrGfCcc6McplHoMQWdTEHlggq5l99U/N/8OANzmaUwQy 8OTfW5S4PDUtzUm7UzTuCLaKIDfdv7a/XjAxEupUYr416cSEmns++wa138N8XFZVhku7 khOg9UIOiPOrsiqTEhJS6XSWBj8wgSOgb/0coH99D1tQ1eW4VFZKKTqesPrHLWv9EIcB ofXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU/yzqZhMJxiKbtC2hNGB+jRMfwB8XNligkznupU4hIKtIjR91O ySLGn43BZ24e26jm7Z2M2uglx3OH9X8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwKkMATgM+UXNRL9XOCmnfDs9fR5S86iwhffSQO36NllcQnfTvH0nxITX+ZoHgHSK6zFhA4KA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:318b:: with SMTP id x133mr77759263pgx.297.1558391698646; Mon, 20 May 2019 15:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-f177.google.com (mail-pl1-f177.google.com. [209.85.214.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d88sm10920468pfm.42.2019.05.20.15.34.57 for <mmusic@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 May 2019 15:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-f177.google.com with SMTP id r18so7362330pls.13 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2019 15:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bd94:: with SMTP id q20mr56083844pls.146.1558391697551; Mon, 20 May 2019 15:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3D9B3546-3C27-42CF-9684-E49D2209C6CF@ericsson.com> <CAMRcRGQkRb0T=H8QPtXBGGJc1RedzAhG03kY4PqpHzV-dz3rZQ@mail.gmail.com> <DD293183-30B5-4F0A-8E69-0405181090AA@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <DD293183-30B5-4F0A-8E69-0405181090AA@ericsson.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 18:34:47 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvFv-TXf_ytWaEtDn6g7JdDCXW7qiXXRoeCF+8zzPsBpA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvFv-TXf_ytWaEtDn6g7JdDCXW7qiXXRoeCF+8zzPsBpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>, Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008db776058959572b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/RcBGNjIn2Mp_seFNZpNdXfUDzxo>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Last chance to comment [Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-27.txt] - Text on ICE PAC
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 22:35:02 -0000
We cannot remove FQDN without breaking compatibility with RFC 5245. Based on RFC 5245, FQDN can be legally specified in connection-address. FQDN handling there is nonsensical, but grammar still allows it, so the safest option is to allow FQDN in connection-address but ignore it. Regards, _____________ Roman Shpount On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 6:31 PM Christer Holmberg < christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > First, if we are going to remove support of FQDN (see other thread), there > is no need to mention it. > > > > Second, I don’t think you need to repeat so much of what is defined in ICE > PAC (which may even still change). I suggest something like: > > > > “[draft-holmberg-ice-pac] provides guidance on finding working candidate > pairs, and is useful to prevent premature declaration of ICE failure > > e.g., if the peer has not provided any candidates, or if all provided > candidates have failed or have been discarded.”! > > > > Regards, > > > > Christer > > > > > > > > > > *From: *Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> > *Date: *Monday, 20 May 2019 at 22.27 > *To: *Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> > *Cc: *Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" < > mmusic@ietf.org> > *Subject: *Re: [MMUSIC] Last chance to comment [Re: I-D Action: > draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-27.txt] - Text on ICE PAC > > > > Thanks Christer. I agree with the intent here. > > > > How about this version > > > > “In certain scenarios when either no candidates were provided in the > > offer or all the provided candidates were discarded (say, due to > > unsupported address type or FQDN name resolution failure), the > > answerer MAY treat it as an immediate ICE processing failure or > > choose to wait for the peer reflexive candidates > > to arrive to perform the connectivity checks > > (see [draft-holmberg-ice-pac]. However, If no peer reflexive candidates > > arrive until the connectivity checks timesout, the ICE > > processing is considered as failure." > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 1:08 PM Christer Holmberg < > christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The new text says: > > > > “In certain scenarios when either no candidates were provided in the > > offer or all the provided candidates were discarded (say, due to > > unsupported address type or FQDN name resolution failure), the > > answerer MUST NOT consider this as immediate ICE processing failure > > but instead MUST wait for the peer reflexive candidates to arrive to > > carryout the connectivity checks or eventually time out on the > > connectivity checks (see [draft-holmberg-ice-pac]).” > > > > I don’t think we shall have these MUST NOT and MUST. > > > > As I have commented in the ICE WG, ICE PAC only gives guidance on how long > to wait before declaring ICE failure, but an agent is still allowed to > declare ICE failiure whenever it wants without being non-compliant with the > spec. > > > > Also, since ICE PAC is generic ICE, I don’t think ice-sip-sdp shall add > any normative text in addition to what is already included in ICE PAC. > > > > However, I do agree that referencing ICE PAC is a good idea, but perhaps > it’s enough to say that ICE PAC gives guidance. > > > > Regards, > > > > Christer > > > > > > *From: *mmusic <mmusic-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Flemming Andreasen < > fandreas@cisco.com> > *Date: *Monday, 20 May 2019 at 17.35 > *To: *"mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org> > *Subject: *[MMUSIC] Last chance to comment [Re: I-D Action: > draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-27.txt] > > > > Greetings MMUSIC > > We believe this version resolves all outstanding issues. This will be the > last chance to comment before we submit the document for Publication > Request. If you have any comments, please make sure to provide them to the > authors and the MMUSIC mailing list no later than Friday May 25. > > Thanks > > -- Flemming (as MMUSIC co-chair) > > On 5/19/19 12:43 AM, Suhas Nandakumar wrote: > > Version 27 has editorial changes for using the term connection address > instead of IP Address. > > > > Please let us know if you have any questions > > > > Cheers > > Suhas > > > > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 9:42 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Multiparty Multimedia Session Control WG > of the IETF. > > Title : Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/Answer > procedures for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) > Authors : Marc Petit-Huguenin > Suhas Nandakumar > Ari Keranen > Filename : draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-27.txt > Pages : 42 > Date : 2019-05-18 > > Abstract: > This document describes Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/ > Answer procedures for carrying out Interactive Connectivity > Establishment (ICE) between the agents. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-27 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-27 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-27 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mmusic mailing list > > mmusic@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > > > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic >
- Re: [MMUSIC] Last chance to comment [Re: I-D Acti… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Last chance to comment [Re: I-D Acti… Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [MMUSIC] Last chance to comment [Re: I-D Acti… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Last chance to comment [Re: I-D Acti… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] Last chance to comment [Re: I-D Acti… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Last chance to comment [Re: I-D Acti… Suhas Nandakumar