IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] ICEbis and IPv6 Privacy adresses

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Fri, 25 July 2014 02:33 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5491A0AD3 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LCCDiUJpZMwj for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x234.google.com (mail-vc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE141A0AC8 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ij19so6204950vcb.25 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=6Hoe9b/f227LBWdwxY136DI0ROroFbfkSdHchL5ajVM=; b=cKiU8Fof1LteqO78pLiG5JhB+MNvpcNm+HIq18zW2n0Zdp7OgBlOtrIdAJnyLhZvEv 2td02twiNJdbiDNtEaDs1zePyuTBdv3iyWBA2sJhudG9jQICTHiJD/S1OuK2kBbM++Do 8905986oWgJ2bD/9L7b+z7yQ0E9frtetA4PAqLnl9SftaC9IJ5om9Zg4aMyEDI36w1Uy 5eeidC2iqPEfRrb1rCRJrq2PfMKvRPAbaq7ABubhPGmZ1S59DUYXgfPsuZ4Ya9lQ2NP1 Cm057a5Q6a8q4bvn7vNBOt1L5qLcwEZkzcooUxDoiCQGszj3DKsOno7fhKu6s8QWxuR6 SdBA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=6Hoe9b/f227LBWdwxY136DI0ROroFbfkSdHchL5ajVM=; b=Zmwea2Mb+5Sjab7zp1hupoyb8JuZ6P5qFjLW6QTAjUthMBHRfrSp9k0xt0a3sU8n34 x2evy7ePZgaUi/yDZkIfx+iAck8kF6SvoOeaCXQ2B3w4+FjuVtH6NMy1M2zYaDEIhzTH CqNND2DdJXHfks1h6wsF/3LzM7SVsphyyrcw1lo/wxTXaNBdmeKNaawR/Mjisd81BPp9 fM0ddEKrbzkOgS8N/RZikjkIWWc3gqT3no8hkuY5+BL4bZHs6fLRfHH7Gb7+hn4k2iRK WdY7wLWNJVossi6pAyKLEzIV7gJ2NI0ojDu5HVhdM0neLY3vNQEZBDaYe6fLuoBE9HQo mWMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm490XMYYt/q9KbyAqbguDqOx3M3ErPU66OX1Zj9/t5b5S+uPkXuCofkhQv9ZD/eLBv3gHG
X-Received: by 10.52.35.81 with SMTP id f17mr14802169vdj.13.1406255612498; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.4.70 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5353C0F5-5769-4C56-9A8A-1C884A7F8CC3@cisco.com>
References: <5353C0F5-5769-4C56-9A8A-1C884A7F8CC3@cisco.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 22:33:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-2zgVhSkjWAeoZ-5wDy=GYdTYSDbsDvgVpY62OOkm8L-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pal Martinsen (palmarti)" <palmarti@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf307ac7893f343804fefb6622"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/SqDsosz73LyUQsrcxyG_0Znf5zI
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] ICEbis and IPv6 Privacy adresses
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 02:33:34 -0000

I believe the point of temporary addresses is to prevent tracking, not to
prevent computing an approximate location. Therefore I don't think we need
to do anything about the other (non-trackable) addresses.


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Pal Martinsen (palmarti) <
palmarti@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I think we need some text in ICEbis saying that if IPv6 Privacy addresses
> is in use, some care should be taken not to expose too many of the other
> potential candidates you have.
>
> Can you reveal your IPv4 host address?
> What about SRFX and RELAY adresses?
> Do we need an TURN extension to ask the TURN server to also use a IPv6
> privacy address when allocation a REALY address for you?
>
> Seems to be problematic to find the right balance between privacy and
> ensured connectivity.
>
> .-.
> Pål-Erik
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email