Re: [MMUSIC] ICEbis and IPv6 Privacy adresses

Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> Fri, 25 July 2014 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <sperreault@jive.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0605C1B2828 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JjiWdrtZFRjn for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com (mail-wg0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 157211B2968 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id k14so4272034wgh.8 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cXAZmdoKq8tGufKrtzAcKQFt+Wm7nXQesd2eLhUMx1k=; b=lHLrYp+ZKyE5b5TXY9zH29/kB1EZc5JbsGpBZjsnH7+ZN0qHoM+fVlzTee86XtZ3be jusDPY1hmhcRx24zxfGswlw6fxlCMkeP2ilF2+TJADrawzjjOYJO/3UmhlLUzmN697Rs BfKRFLBk+Os62BRyP81z2dzDwZ2e0bYNZUPBs5+nzeZH/08MKpFbuKfLAGZomlxnbvc6 t2M30Yn7gAV8R4bHChHYwpzg4aEUrOmALbyADMnLsK8mYdf30RN/SNujMSRMQFWBeQVT M2gaPHHa62zv9mh3PmUT3jqIywqMudJpI3wqW9VCV0LpNMVEnJQ91AMKEe8Zckx7cZY2 eYBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkE4QDMdiUpLxh1uI2wj4y0S91nvNVSaxE1wyyKjZdtIdeHiTgmGeBgU83+T39kAHZN/dct
X-Received: by 10.180.89.143 with SMTP id bo15mr5596258wib.78.1406298307122; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org ([2001:67c:1231:998:9dec:20b7:9edc:fe13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h3sm25665159wjz.48.2014.07.25.07.25.05 for <mmusic@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53D268C0.1070604@jive.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:25:04 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <5353C0F5-5769-4C56-9A8A-1C884A7F8CC3@cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-2zgVhSkjWAeoZ-5wDy=GYdTYSDbsDvgVpY62OOkm8L-w@mail.gmail.com> <53D24FFE.1040802@jive.com>
In-Reply-To: <53D24FFE.1040802@jive.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/dsw2Mgi39k5FwlFMd8O-acS3bsM
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] ICEbis and IPv6 Privacy adresses
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:25:27 -0000

Le 2014-07-25 08:39, Simon Perreault a écrit :
> Therefore, proposed text:
> 
> If one or more host candidates corresponding to IPv6 privacy addresses
> are advertised, host candidates corresponding to other kinds of IPv6
> addresses on the same interface MUST NOT be advertised.

Updated text, per today's live discussion:

If one or more host candidates corresponding to IPv6 privacy addresses
are advertised, host candidates corresponding to other kinds of IPv6
addresses on the same interface and having the same network prefix MUST
NOT be advertised.

Simon