Re: [MMUSIC] Not fixing a=rtcp and rtcp-mux exclusive

Kevin Dempsey <kevindempsey70@gmail.com> Fri, 22 January 2016 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <kevindempsey70@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1F31ACE50 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 01:35:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BRJTlEUDtT6e for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 01:35:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x232.google.com (mail-yk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89FE21A1AB2 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 01:35:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id a85so80012202ykb.1 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 01:35:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LqxEthbemAwpZda44YznPTUPTG9wGnhr488A5Y0vr10=; b=H4tW1MrlZv0Cm1dbrTHFG4TicrcLPEt3HFUQr5CcrYorFVL9aEGyYljMX06fnUHvaU zvRCYP2T/HV8wFto75fMORu8uw9WuKgCmn8WiQRLQlOexeKBqPSmd0NOdT2sfQmEc1go kUBxboimW4MfVT6QaJRv3xeHjQv2UrdKuYP0ALWH+hP/cFeoTjz4pk5a/K46WQFje7C8 lpzp9Sa6Ko29RsyQwn849GvnugFbrNzlrkv08saVhjfTcu3CTnXkS7F/gRMRw3qp5V9H ksIGnqPgpP8zmReicRHZ5lLU7f1vPjyjDKc9nOhQWdl60Sq9RPdXbMR8UnnpbsZOKvxK vH2w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LqxEthbemAwpZda44YznPTUPTG9wGnhr488A5Y0vr10=; b=as/ZQidfgkuNaMCpSI/mToo0v/sZFmc9LYatNvr2Gj7CKvAJN9q3737aFCasDWXclT 2V90x2IoE/52I/UTxLoNegHFZE9+Rg21I3LmirvG1/Ekk1PrW49s5wgaYEtQN5Xu+zCQ fwSGh2KEudoWoOTTC8du+MJgvftLDcejVf40J2fnYjodUGcdivFgzK1yaSxPwAVZyF7k 0hxe0oeZ0nHQgwSmmOwQ1Ct6xs2/I3SGIuXzE8CxcU1orrVf/ybBJ9uZQdndizMdIwOs 1QwKYaJSn7M5agr7Hsp7NTwjZzl/4EdP9cFpimURHCYL+yFG7tYj2QIvbKN5KYUo6H+Z xrjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORoOiSdCKstLHkc/u04Z0Vc3QQMTFRiYIcD0mZbKKO5lvi1uc5TCwx68hGUjgViszUUAI0+/v8784SLTA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.37.33.133 with SMTP id h127mr1005554ybh.170.1453455346891; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 01:35:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.129.128.69 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 01:35:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37D557C6@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CAD5OKxvMdsdkYaJWB5UdvCTNj3a+pheXV+_1viyLrH_UOWBTpA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37D5509D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxum=E84NVTtWtSwYowDmyJ=sQifx6Na9wt0pUhYH1j_PA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37D557C6@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:35:46 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMvTgcffWjB153y=9iJ3MU5EWwZoi4qVVg_J6MGjRe-jy30vLg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kevin Dempsey <kevindempsey70@gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143e92aa604b50529e8f1fd"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/Tg1AH_Y450Mg6GYDebQCEjNadtY>
Cc: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Not fixing a=rtcp and rtcp-mux exclusive
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:35:49 -0000

Would changing the protocol field of the m= line make sense in this case?
For example:

c=IN IP4 11.22.33.44
m=12345 RTPMUX/AVP 0 99

Endpoints that don't support mux-exclusive should reject that m= line.

On 22 January 2016 at 08:27, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > We can for sure define a new attribute, if people prefer that.
> >
> > But, it still wouldn't solve Paul's issue, that a non-ICE endpoint that
> doesn't support the attribute may start sending RTCP on RTP+1. But, at
> least the offerer would see from the answer that the answerer does not
> support mux-exclusive, and can take proper actions.
> >
> > We can define new attribute that specifies address and port for both RTP
> and RTCP similar to ICE candidate or a=rtcp attribute and set address in c=
> line to IN IP4 0.0.0.0. This way any end point that does not understand
> this attribute will send no media.
>
> Another option would be to set the m- line port to zero, like we do for
> bundle-only. Then, if the answerer doesn't support the attribute, it won't
> use the m- line.
>
> Example:
>
> c=IN IP4 11.22.33.44
> m=0 RTP/AVP 0 99
> a=mux-exclusive: 12345  <------- 12345 is the port to be used for RTP and
> RTCP
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>