IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04.txt> (Offer/Answer Considerations for G723 Annex A and G729 Annex B) to Proposed Standard

SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 03 December 2013 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC4C1AE0F4 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 02:00:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id waSaVYXi4bNr for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 02:00:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5BC1AE101 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 02:00:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rB39xlkD009808; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 02:00:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1386064805; bh=wtD5rJOvCrFtCbnQsK25hhF8twFME053CbnZvCAT8wc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=NKVSyf2nNX7I3AYSLcCVuo3X/73FOklOqy3MdP2oJYthV8X2o1TsX2EkMkDPFFn+G J7ARi65Gn1WDsOE5SUp4XUgkZQjCdssUNvESa3dTREg/NDAEQ/8xCUXPSd+pdkqSac tlnaof2D1zT0GINZob1TKmzfUlXHHwyM6cTaC1qc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1386064805; i=@resistor.net; bh=wtD5rJOvCrFtCbnQsK25hhF8twFME053CbnZvCAT8wc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=K2NEbLPqg8XdOEBV7XsKwaXyIH9tj+NqL9gXa9dRJRgQiKScB87RMj/sXYOjk6I9t jNAKRGLx6A1ycRG7Rl4ncpVczmblbyrXZJoCkwKiwyqPNGYOpZUk8SuQ3DT90NY4AF xhYJdf+MHL1HulYeXmhyk5cFvT+CBPiuawfRwFrA=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131203011347.0db5d4e8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 01:44:32 -0800
To: Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <529CA719.3090007@ericsson.com>
References: <20131030131748.6987.86198.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20131030185231.0ddfb7a8@resistor.net> <00a101ced981$77414d60$65c3e820$@co.in> <00ab01cee555$05f53560$11dfa020$@co.in> <6.2.5.6.2.20131119110213.0cb0dd40@resistor.net> <003301cee952$852cd120$8f867360$@co.in> <6.2.5.6.2.20131129000812.0bdaa088@resistor.net> <016d01ceed31$aa7a1130$ff6e3390$@co.in> <6.2.5.6.2.20131130003721.0d65a980@resistor.net> <529CA719.3090007@ericsson.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04.txt> (Offer/Answer Considerations for G723 Annex A and G729 Annex B) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:00:11 -0000

Hi Ari,
At 07:28 02-12-2013, Ari Keränen wrote:
>As Partha & Muthu already mentioned, there was 
>discussion and a consensus call on the type of 
>the document and the consensus was that PS is 
>the correct type. Admittedly the proto write-up 
>could have been a bit more elaborate on that.

Thanks for the response.  In my humble opinion it 
is not worth the effort to look into the details 
of the process if that can be avoided.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email