Re: [MMUSIC] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04.txt> (Offer/Answer Considerations for G723 Annex A and G729 Annex B) to Proposed Standard

SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 03 December 2013 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4BE1AE0FD for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 02:00:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kl2Hiu2glsq2 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 02:00:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF891AE0FC for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 02:00:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rB39xlkB009808; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 01:59:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1386064800; bh=VwGW5lsOKDGYul4ZHEVSmZMb7rO+6Avnz5XAbezdbwc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=ym8bUZyH2c3DQxDZNUzw7Xe6aDPlASSMAqYxq+foFU0os4ubSipnTCeTUi0Luw+zi QdlBH0X0ayn2pQ2632uNeKILkPWyB4r/19Z/oWHL49wzAaiQYwPPEI+t4VyzxDZ5b5 HI78Ke2mHcBfJZy9j9HwqbRZtqlA8c2KFuuGa6EU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1386064800; i=@resistor.net; bh=VwGW5lsOKDGYul4ZHEVSmZMb7rO+6Avnz5XAbezdbwc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=gbYGpMJGxyKnnU+2oXYgJin5m9wpho2kcHqxdFI+bBilli6s2aWg9aGXM7xpYsVKo tujRC8Vn0SKVo9MxHgXZhp2sFZUQaMyalMovvoAGP2UjVWm7GdaHfNdwVRG7ai+ZIt TgPkJPMzXWNtn0AeZBG4SYh48m2/vGgq7OFZyF/8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131203011102.0db5d8c0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 01:13:41 -0800
To: "Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)" <mperumal@cisco.com>, Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <E721D8C6A2E1544DB2DEBC313AF54DE22436AD4D@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco .com>
References: <20131030131748.6987.86198.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20131030185231.0ddfb7a8@resistor.net> <00a101ced981$77414d60$65c3e820$@co.in> <00ab01cee555$05f53560$11dfa020$@co.in> <6.2.5.6.2.20131119110213.0cb0dd40@resistor.net> <003301cee952$852cd120$8f867360$@co.in> <6.2.5.6.2.20131129000812.0bdaa088@resistor.net> <016d01ceed31$aa7a1130$ff6e3390$@co.in> <6.2.5.6.2.20131130003721.0d65a980@resistor.net> <E721D8C6A2E1544DB2DEBC313AF54DE22436AD4D@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: "Flemming Andreasen (fandreas)" <fandreas@cisco.com>, mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04.txt> (Offer/Answer Considerations for G723 Annex A and G729 Annex B) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:00:08 -0000

Hi Muthu,
At 05:51 02-12-2013, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal) wrote:
>|Media type registrations are usually published as Informational RFCs.
>|I suggest publishing draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-04 as an 
>Information RFC.
>
>Registered audio media types are listed here:
>http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/audio
>
>As you can see most of them are described in Standards Track RFCs, 
>so your observation is incorrect.

I was referring to media type registrations for IANA action.  That is 
different from the intended status.

Regards,
-sm