RE: [MMUSIC] New draft: multiple times problem description:draft-garcia-mmusic-multiple-ptimes-problem-00.txt
"Joe Stone \(joestone\)" <joestone@cisco.com> Thu, 31 May 2007 03:55 UTC
Return-path: <mmusic-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtblE-0006BS-Bn; Wed, 30 May 2007 23:55:40 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtblD-0006BN-EQ for mmusic@ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 23:55:39 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Htbks-0003Bq-0m for mmusic@ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 23:55:39 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 May 2007 20:55:17 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,596,1170662400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="156728602:sNHT267702903"
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l4V3tHE4006823; Wed, 30 May 2007 20:55:17 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l4V3tHtV026245; Thu, 31 May 2007 03:55:17 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.88]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 30 May 2007 20:55:16 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] New draft: multiple times problem description:draft-garcia-mmusic-multiple-ptimes-problem-00.txt
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:55:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CDB8E728D94C3A48BAACD57F390C40220329DE2C@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: RE: [MMUSIC] New draft: multiple times problem description:draft-garcia-mmusic-multiple-ptimes-problem-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcejN38aYj5Tf3DMRSKH4+YWZVbs7A==
From: "Joe Stone (joestone)" <joestone@cisco.com>
To: Miguel.Garcia@nsn.com, mmusic@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 May 2007 03:55:16.0900 (UTC) FILETIME=[7FFA7E40:01C7A337]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=27559; t=1180583717; x=1181447717; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=joestone@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Joe=20Stone=20\(joestone\)=22=20<joestone@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[MMUSIC]=20New=20draft=3A=20multiple=20times=20proble m=20description=3Adraft-garcia-mmusic-multiple-ptimes-problem-00.txt |Sender:=20; bh=FVMPeoRgjwxVhvtGPH414TOkYb90/nNr+Vz6JnsBhpo=; b=XWVpheI+H37TY9O+K0W53ciaWtbWQkUpW8QISUbe3jkvtuzNAHnJQYO/W86x3nlJOyB3wYnT v0jGyLp8I4/gAI+LzG3V6nRrBN/4rJ5+C30vNnRf5Sq6RPhzG1BCDKtw;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=joestone@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 645960076aa293effd9740db2f975dc3
Cc:
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1290680050=="
Errors-To: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org
I think think that your Problem Statement has short-changed the "maxmptime" SDP attribute of V.152, One of these mechanisms is the 'maxmptime' attribute, defined in the ITU-T Recommendation V.152 [ITU.V152], which "indicates the supported packetization period for all codec payload types". The complete definition of the 'maxmptime' SDP attribute follows, In addition to negotiating support of V.152 and the corresponding RTP payload type, a V.152 implementation should include the 'maxmptime' attribute (maximum multiple ptime) to indicate the supported packetisation period for all codec payload types. a=maxmptime:<list of packet times separated by space> This attribute is a media-level attribute. The maxmptime attribute defines a list of maximum packetisation time values, expressed in milliseconds, the endpoint is capable of using (sending and receiving) for this connection. There shall be precisely one entry in the list for each <format> entry provided in the "m=" line. Each entry is separated by a space. Entry number j in this list defines the maximum packetisation time for entry number j in the "m=" line. The first entry in the list shall be a decimal number whereas subsequent entries in the list shall be either a decimal number or a hyphen. For those media formats where a single maximum packetisation rate does not apply (e.g. non- voice codecs such as telephone-event or comfort noise), a hyphen ("-") shall be included at the corresponding location in the list of packetisation periods. When receiving an SDP session description the maxmptime attribute conveys the list of maximum packetisation periods that the remote endpoint is capable of using for this connection; one for each media format in the "m=" line. For media formats whose packetization period is specified as a hyphen ("-"), the VBD gateway shall use one of the maximum packetization periods that was actually specified in the list. The "a=ptime" attribute defined in RFC 2327 shall be ignored if the SDP session description contains the "maxmptime" attribute. If the "maxmptime" attribute is absent, then the value of the "ptime" attribute, if present, shall be taken as indicating the packetization period for all codecs present in the "m=" line. If neither the 'ptime' nor 'maxmptime' attribute are present in the SDP session description, then a V.152 implementation shall assume the default packetisation period defined in RFC3550 (which is 20 ms for G.711 and G.726-32k). A V.152 implementation shall not transmit V.152 packets with a packetisaton time greater other than the one offered by the remote end. With the 'maxmptime' SDP attribute, there is one maximum packetization period value (possibly "-") for each media format (payload type) in the media description. You've misrepresented the PacketCable 'mptime' SDP attribute, Another one is the 'mptime' attribute, defined in the PacketCable Network- Based Call Signaling Protocol Specification [PKT.PKT-SP-EC-MGCP], which indicates "a list of packetization period values the endpoint is capable of using (sending and receiving) for this connection". While all have similar semantics, there is obviously no interoperability between them, creating a nightmare for the implementor who happens to be defining a common SDP stack for different applications. defined in the PacketCable Network-Based Call Signaling Protocol Specification, http://www.packetcable.com/downloads/specs/PKT-SP-NCS1.5-I03-040712.pdf and the PacketCable PSTN Gateway Call Signaling Protocol Specification, http://www.packetcable.com/downloads/specs/PKT-SP-TGCP1.5-I03-040712.pdf The 'mptime' SDP attribute is more than "a list of packetization period values the endpoint is capable of using (sending and receiving) for this connection". The complete definition of the 'mptime' SDP attribute follows, mptime: This attribute is a media-level attribute defined by PacketCable. The mptime attribute defines a list of packetization period values the endpoint is capable of using (sending and receiving) for this connection. Send: The mptime attribute MUST be present. There MUST be precisely one entry in the list for each <format> entry provided in the "m=" line. Entry number j in this list defines the packetization period for entry number j in the "m=" line. The first entry in the list MUST be a decimal number whereas subsequent entries in the list MUST be either a decimal number or a hyphen. For those media formats where a single packetization rate does not apply (e.g., nonvoice codecs such as telephone-event or comfort noise), a hyphen ("-") MUST be encoded at the corresponding location in the list of packetization periods. Receive: Conveys the list of packetization periods that the remote endpoint is capable of using for this connection; one for each media format in the "m=" line. For media formats whose packetization period is specified as a hyphen ("-"), the endpoint MUST use one of the packetization periods that was actually specified in the list. If the "mptime" attribute is absent, then the value of the "ptime" attribute, if present, MUST be taken as indicating the packetization period for all codecs present in the "m=" line. and note the PacketCable semantics related to the 'ptime' SDP attribute, ptime: Send: The ptime SHOULD be sent if it was received in a Remote Connection Descriptor or if the CMS used the packetization period ('p:') LocalConnectionOption. Receive: The field MUST be ignored if the SDP contains the "mptime" attribute (as required in PacketCable compliant devices). If the "mptime" attribute is not present, then this field is used to define the packetization interval for all codecs present in the SDP description and the MTA MUST use the ptime in the calculation of QoS reservations. With the 'mptime' SDP attribute, there is one packetization period value (possibly "-") for each media format (payload type) in the media description. There's no "interoperability nightmare" within the context in which the 'mptime' SDP attribute is defined. The above semantics state that the 'mptime' SDP attribute takes precedence over the 'ptime' SDP attribute, if present. An implementation which does not recognize the 'mptime' SDP attribute must ignore it. Note that similar precedence rules *could* be defined between the 'maxptime' and 'maxmptime' SDP attributes. Your Problem Statement should address the issue of backward compatibility. Regardless of your final solution, the proposed syntax and semantics must be backward compatible with existing implementations. PacketCable addresses backward compatibility through the precedence rule, the fundamental SDP principle of ignoring unrecognized attributes, "offers" which include both old and new syntax and "answers" which are consistent (in terms of syntax) with "offers". I think that you've understated the problem of existing packetization period semantics being nothing more than a preference or recommendation (as it relates to actually sending based on the "negotiated" packetization period). If we can agree on per media format packetization period syntax and semantics, have we really solved the problem if the "negotiated" packetization period is nothing more than a recommendation? This problem (the lack of "strict" negotiation) isn't unique to packetization period. I think that there's a general solution that we can discuss at a later date. I appreciate the fact that you're attempting to finally bring closure to this long-standing issue. Joe
_______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list mmusic@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
- RE: [MMUSIC] New draft: multiple times problem de… Joe Stone (joestone)
- Re: [MMUSIC] New draft: multiple times problem de… Miguel Garcia
- RE: [MMUSIC] New draft: multiple times problem de… Joe Stone (joestone)
- Re: [MMUSIC] New draft: multiple times problem de… Miguel Garcia
- [MMUSIC] RE: New draft: multiple times problem de… Stephen Mell (CV/ETL)
- Re: [MMUSIC] New draft: multiple times problem de… Miguel Garcia
- Re: [MMUSIC] RE: New draft: multiple times proble… Christian Groves
- [MMUSIC] RE: New draft: multiple times problem de… Stephen Mell (CV/ETL)