Re: [MMUSIC] Extremely drafty minutes

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Tue, 05 March 2013 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874B121F87D2; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:06:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AiFQ9D-0-aDc; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:06:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A977821F87BA; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:06:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1884; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1362503196; x=1363712796; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ki+WIgbBNft6w05nY3kHrmSZaVCBZPMW6aPCbtdAInQ=; b=L/h4/FC5TAvCFnaAcE1TQM+jaUDDSI8Qb2qNAPluR6qJDPxv46Hh6Ero VHLXo4CL+A/HTjLW3utwLJFvBU8ZogHqIaCBeRnUkFQX61TfpQ+yMVvfn 6sJ2dSvUffsH3FH/ak5EWUdtRuJqfQv/oqetSDDa9q4tgAuVKzDnwhTDk s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAK8kNlGtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABExG6BaBZzgikBAQEEOksEAgEIEQQBAQsUCQcyFAkIAgQBEgiICgGsZpA0jlwmEgaCWWEDpziDCIIn
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,787,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="183996195"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2013 17:06:36 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r25H6aIc001909 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 5 Mar 2013 17:06:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.144]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 11:06:36 -0600
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] Extremely drafty minutes
Thread-Index: AQHOFtwkfs1cLJI9OEe4++p7b3Zq05iXWJtA
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:06:35 +0000
Message-ID: <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C08828047C706E@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMATtoDi+xhNtSTPyEJg2h+e8jL8sdn0P=36eC+zij7YLQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMATtoDi+xhNtSTPyEJg2h+e8jL8sdn0P=36eC+zij7YLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [171.68.16.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Extremely drafty minutes
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:06:37 -0000

Hi Ted,

Thanks for the notes. It was a challenging session to summarize, so I really appreciate your efforts here.
One question I have is in regard to the following point from the Feb 5 summary.

" All SSRCs related to a single peer connection (which could encompasses more than one MediaStreams having more than one track) would come from a single SSRC space. "

Is this a restatement of an opinion expressed at the mic, or does it carry some weight as a working group consensus? I recall discussion in this area, but I did not think consensus was reached that this is the way to go. If that is the case, I think the notes should mention that more discussion is needed.

Cheers,
Charles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Ted Hardie
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 4:23 PM
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org; mmusic@ietf.org
> Subject: [MMUSIC] Extremely drafty minutes
> 
> Howdy,
> 
> I've been working on minutes for the interim meeting last month; I've
> attached the current draft.  It needs *extensive* review, as I had
> planned to work off recordings for two days, and they turned out to be
> available for only half of one.  Several folks have volunteered their
> notes, but I have not made nearly enough progress.  I've decided that
> it's better to have something out than nothing, so here they are, in
> the current state.
> 
> Please review them and provide input; I will continue to work on them,
> but if we don't get more input, they will be *terrible*.
> 
> My apologies for the plan going awry on this, and for the delay.  I
> kept hoping that more time spent with them would make them coherent;
> in large part, I suspect that helped very little all.  Please excuse
> that and help us correct it,
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Ted Hardie