Re: [MMUSIC] draft-ejzak-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg: external rejection of channel

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 28 February 2014 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F52B1A085C for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:57:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jomb5F151gPT for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:57:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC91B1A083E for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:57:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.71]) by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id XpJr1n00A1YDfWL55rxAW7; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:57:10 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([130.129.152.238]) by omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Xruu1n00H58sGga3gruwrg; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:55:08 +0000
Message-ID: <5310B14E.4000809@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:54:54 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju)" <Raju.Makaraju@alcatel-lucent.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1BC516@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJuyhsyk4jO_TS=5khD9ROAx7uYU1YAkCV0Xy4QVUkiqXBJJfg@mail.gmail.com> <E1FE4C082A89A246A11D7F32A95A17826DFFB545@US70UWXCHMBA02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <530E4E34.4010707@alum.mit.edu> <E1FE4C082A89A246A11D7F32A95A17826DFFEDAB@US70UWXCHMBA02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1C023A@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <E1FE4C082A89A246A11D7F32A95A17826DFFF2E4@US70UWXCHMBA02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1FE4C082A89A246A11D7F32A95A17826DFFF2E4@US70UWXCHMBA02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1393603030; bh=f9fp8KuOfJ9zm18eCbvBXn0kpxqdlHNcscQWACXwnYQ=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=F/LR0zG8rf9MGFPCVrnz1dIdwW8bHsnCzQO02fyDnrbBjbjz4cAabW21Dnm1cp7ps dh/wpvMw01VsJ7aXs6062qovHS88AhY4kak1TgmaAAyuoPT+HzRgsYuBso+OdmgPUn ubh6ozpv2Kf/NfNRljhhPp+VubssrhcLlRRQVtKa8QBa8fJgzFIk1pKcbh9mEuuBDb gWi/atNgAF7nKKJEC6PzuhdNx8/9R4meFXW2eoxg4fpwtzIfgoKsMN6NsuygTF68ow jSJi7g4zn7eiCJ0dOJJLtj1YwQORWDCCA+ku1QzTJCwoIoOnj9JKwiikpJuRU/ceim 5432jPau05sPA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/fANgb7180l1A8uk3BXOCCJIc2w4
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] draft-ejzak-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg: external rejection of channel
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:57:14 -0000

Raju,

On 2/27/14 5:59 PM, Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju) wrote:
> Hi Christer,
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Isn't it enough to, in the data channel protocol spec, say that the odd/even
>> rule applies unless the stream id is explicitly negotiated using some other
>> mechanism?
>>
> [Raju] Yes, that is sufficient from DCP draft. draft-ejzak-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg should still need to say that "when both external and DCP are used, even for DCP created streams the stream ids have to be specified and managed by the application (else DCP stack will default to odd/even rule per DTLS role which may conflict with SDP offer/answer rule)".

Can we assume there must be a mechanism for using DCEP and still 
controlling which channels are used?

It might help if the O/A negotiation also followed the even/odd rule.
But there are difficulties in knowing who is even and who is odd for the 
first O/A.

If the offerer always creates the channel before sending the offer, then 
that will prevent the two mechanisms from stepping on one another's 
stream ids.

	Thanks,
	Paul

> Thanks for agreeing to add this to the draft!
>
> Raju
>
>