IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Suggestion to moving ahead with BUNDLE

Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> Wed, 08 February 2012 11:03 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A1221F869C for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 03:03:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w2JgsnOft7LO for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 03:03:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5865021F869A for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 03:03:29 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7bf2ae0000069a1-7d-4f325680f036
Received: from esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0A.8B.27041.086523F4; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:03:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [150.132.142.235] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.137.0; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:03:28 +0100
Message-ID: <4F32567F.8030401@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:03:27 +0100
From: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <4F3255C1.8050300@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F3255C1.8050300@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:09:33 -0800
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Suggestion to moving ahead with BUNDLE
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:03:30 -0000

Being involved in the rtcweb/webrtc work, I would like this proposal to 
move forward (as it solves an important problem in that context).

Stefan

On 02/08/2012 12:00 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the Taipei IETF I presented the BUNDLE draft, written by myself
> and Harald, which extends the SDP grouping framework in order to
> allow the usage of identical port values in multiple m- lines in an
> SDP offer/answer.
>
>
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-multiplex-negotiation-00.txt
>
>  It can be used when negotiating the usage of multiplexing of
> multiple media streams. Such mechanism is very likely going to be
> needed e.g. in the work being done in RTCWEB.
>
> When presented, some people indicated that they may want to look at
> other alternatives.
>
> However, as no alternative solutions have been brought forward since
> then, my question is whether people now would be interested in
> moving ahead with the BUNDLE mechanism, and adopt the above draft as
> a starting point?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email