IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MMUSIC] Suggestion to moving ahead with BUNDLE

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 31 January 2012 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3B621F848C for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:08:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.131
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.468, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gOFolsTcYWLR for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:08:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE92321F844E for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:08:33 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7b26ae000000a35-70-4f27e7d0d648
Received: from esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 7B.69.02613.0D7E72F4; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:08:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.175]) by esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.96]) with mapi; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:08:31 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:08:31 +0100
Thread-Topic: Suggestion to moving ahead with BUNDLE
Thread-Index: AQHM4BlkoRrWUt69ykuo5ZFipVGDNA==
Message-ID: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852C3D31B9B3@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [MMUSIC] Suggestion to moving ahead with BUNDLE
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:08:34 -0000

Hi,

At the Taipei IETF I presented the BUNDLE draft, written by myself and Harald, which extends the SDP grouping framework in order to allow the usage of identical port values in multiple m- lines in an SDP offer/answer.



http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-multiplex-negotiation-00.txt

It can be used when negotiating the usage of multiplexing of multiple media streams. Such mechanism is very likely going to be needed e.g. in the work being done in RTCWEB.

When presented, some people indicated that they may want to look at other alternatives.

However, as no alternative solutions have been brought forward since then, my question is whether people now would be interested in moving ahead with the BUNDLE mechanism, and adopt the above draft as a starting point?

Best regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email