IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5245 (3952)

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 09 April 2014 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C1A1A034A for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 07:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GYDGRonppwcR for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 07:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com (mail-oa0-f44.google.com [209.85.219.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17221A035C for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 07:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n16so2837223oag.17 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 07:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kZPmlI6xaQRyRZIe7CPZg2LQMkzBypIpagWJ4HSOqqc=; b=hKIT8ZArXcYJ8pQKmlj9DQlG2gt5m0Tn9DZH9/zajOVfBlcEhexAy87ek9TrHSqP1D dXW5g3qX087e6nytZueY/axBlTPpXStmirUobCAg7E1gN9OSacMSDJThwKzqdX3duLjs xd85UoSuMKDMCoIUchdHGYRAyzR33D7gPE1Grntcfegt0giKgCfpv1m1p8w6f06xHPYj gCf+U0cQ3/qzarT9rF8QxvOJcSdcYQFT2obAOFh/zpRlOnxUo1ELUANYWOBNS29X7Qky ZRmpeI6ItqLMR5+NwvtxO+8jXoqQ/PFW+anq5W5eTupxCRHQuoSi7TAnlXKXoFzZe6Ib qmbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmd8BikBujJIv3JO4JZLDs/VRgdwgp+449V7Qswz5f97/iLpQrDDQlpX5go6uAtMd00N5bx
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.28.195 with SMTP id d3mr9147885obh.19.1397055105245; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 07:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.136.231 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 07:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53453D5B.9020108@ericsson.com>
References: <20140404114208.DC6DF7FC39C@rfc-editor.org> <CABkgnnUNjFeLm9O0uGkfAx1S3bNaz2G3xRxUsWdcXZrCCv0c_A@mail.gmail.com> <53453D5B.9020108@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 10:51:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQpjjMxq_-ffEqVHH4kMptJ-S9=ovZewY_DRwezPzp_tg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2cd1847b8b404f69d3d65"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/nV5UYQYeqNoOWKN-N5K40qNhFJs
Cc: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, tsuresh20@gmail.com, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5245 (3952)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 14:52:38 -0000

Thanks for the quick feedback.  I have marked this as Rejected.


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>wrote:

> On 04/04/14 18:37, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
>> On 4 April 2014 04:42, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Can i know why the priority is maximum of 10 DIGIT length? If possible
>>> we may decrease to 9 DIGIT, so that the value will be fit into integer of
>>> 32bit.
>>>
>>
>> I don't think that the ABNF has to be perfectly prescriptive.  There
>> is text that covers the actual limit (2^32-1).  An exact ABNF would be
>> much harder to understand.
>>
>> Anyone using ABNF and only ABNF to validate syntax is welcome to
>> construct a more precise grammar for their needs.  What is described
>> here is perfectly adequate for an RFC.
>>
>
> I agree with Martin and to clarify: you need up to 10 decimal digits to
> express the whole range of 32 bit integers and hence "1*9 DIGIT" would not
> be sufficient.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ari
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email