IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MMUSIC] [Errata Rejected] RFC5245 (3952)

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Wed, 09 April 2014 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C891A03A1 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.275
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.275 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rbc0_Galup9t for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA071A03B3 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id DD15818000C; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: tsuresh20@gmail.com, jdrosen@jdrosen.net, alissa@cooperw.in, fandreas@cisco.com, ari.keranen@ericsson.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20140409160743.DD15818000C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 09:07:43 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/oSz3vYnau1BodKFMpTEjUYiHWZQ
Cc: mmusic@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [MMUSIC] [Errata Rejected] RFC5245 (3952)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 16:07:54 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC5245,
"Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5245&eid=3952

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: Suresh Tummala <tsuresh20@gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2014-04-04
Rejected by: Richard Barnes (IESG)

Section: 15.1

Original Text
-------------
priority = 1*10DIGIT


Corrected Text
--------------


Notes
-----
priority = 1*10DIGIT

Here the maximum value it can hold is "9999999999"(ten-nines)(priority is of maximum length 10 DIGIT as per grammar in sec 15.1).

The number of bits required to hold the maximum value(ten-nines) is 34. Which requires a "double" value instead of integer of 32 bit.

Can i know why the priority is maximum of 10 DIGIT length? If possible we may decrease to 9 DIGIT, so that the value will be fit into integer of 32bit.

-- VERIFIER NOTES -- 
The limitation to 2^32-1 is made clear elsewhere in the text. The ABNF does not need to enforce this constraint

--------------------------------------
RFC5245 (draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-19)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols
Publication Date    : April 2010
Author(s)           : J. Rosenberg
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiparty Multimedia Session Control
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email