IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] (Rough) Consensus Call - No FQDN support in ice-sip-sdp

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Tue, 21 May 2019 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16F9120047 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2019 14:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lrFWcAczjP_6 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2019 14:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8530B120044 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2019 14:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id n2so128437pgp.11 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2019 14:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3mbyneQj3Qq6HRASxfwjRjJ7RkJp6cVk1D/LhUwmqLE=; b=azaBODOT0IHvUB/BihZ/JUXJY1qSRF1G7x/Uf2EbvwLBF0vRDWJ8N18GsQiqNwD4ZL WkhNly3xDzoqp7mp5LWUF4T979yoM8UQtVaAi5vixYwdymf0hAH7XjDOU3AV6uzxwVkK mUZTpDUh/+U61ykkMoyymDu1VzUXXEi9x8AXHGeJ7nx/ddMP8vTTQNlYA9ONLH3PWgQl d9JSMIqgdqBitGQcXUntTZHl2RFJZfg6Ye5DhFWhmbh6CcADInwgLOyN26qZC75v/PIs GSQ1akn2vv6ypozUyVtS+URxq++S+LWOVzbGFmMnOhZGSz6pKOnKjeC9UhEqy91pzKpd Pq7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3mbyneQj3Qq6HRASxfwjRjJ7RkJp6cVk1D/LhUwmqLE=; b=mrTz+hJbQHtKlY2l6zI6A6rVDwl5uNGUl2BjdkSDF9U03LUDUfccRY8e0Ueg5WOGA4 tT3zeXPjUHbRSAJEnfdbcDrlrG8oi+Uku7nZlX7POLTQ0a85AitOjvm76Z+ED5OjDr6S 0fTumV3exPDGGShxLwlg+lpgaBukoCMv3GKy/pNGW+TrFBXVrhpH03F1k/Vo/U8bQFYg WwgIa8OYYmzOPSpn0wjOb79yCwVAe7LuHaNtsS0U6U259LMRbTm7evylIMsGhQZWaEBY WatTkSPQoJquONExmgw1/xXtVo5OoNxSgo9QrkDo0lpIeO31RDPfTXDV7CSXv2oIuKxY /49g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWJAngZwc+k9XbNwoS53ymNRv+6WsoQE0L3HFk8NDUSU/ce0tJ7 c951t4bxwtI5ujxhU9gH0pkSWECsaIs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzBkxeX1hL4cAE/Dh8sc0k4cos9qGvT9SCBEt4oasgW0ZRIniZgJC7KnTqO0/l48pIgU7gWQw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:8893:: with SMTP id l141mr33417647pfd.261.1558473887853; Tue, 21 May 2019 14:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-f178.google.com (mail-pg1-f178.google.com. [209.85.215.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f5sm15501704pgc.7.2019.05.21.14.24.46 for <mmusic@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 May 2019 14:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-f178.google.com with SMTP id v11so144775pgl.5 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2019 14:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a63:8b4b:: with SMTP id j72mr85172014pge.318.1558473886414; Tue, 21 May 2019 14:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <77400318-1e2c-7d33-ab41-a3b8d0062b00@cisco.com> <CAMRcRGQ0gQ0c-pmBQ2ZOOX-5uGWkfy57Yu0QMuAp9ED2f8drwA@mail.gmail.com> <D7E2876E-E750-40C6-B33E-FC24F9CD0709@ericsson.com> <CAOW+2dsy5_cjH2BJJq7mRu9JaQNmh7oqWxUrFDPqBKaceffJaQ@mail.gmail.com> <2226B494-B058-45C8-901B-1B872218ECE7@ericsson.com> <CAD5OKxs2fvyqxjcNmNbqx+ToSpnaeqj5LyX4qz2rOuqFp3oBow@mail.gmail.com> <710E80DF-8389-4A5E-9DBE-5DF2D20E4F02@ericsson.com> <CAD5OKxtcEWmRvXanh7FsdQAD_fTFRnQc8HhkeLx9mz+-XUX7-Q@mail.gmail.com> <871E99E8-DA8D-4E71-B359-F2388479C38E@ericsson.com> <CAOW+2dvUAed2P-xCOvbcsHJGcs92=ad9T5K63xhpVqdKvjK2fw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxuU-wio4Af8me1OMo62vanu5y_PnQ3nq=UF6jh6yr1EFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOW+2dskL5P+02xujeEL-SGVPQ8-Gy85hX_DE10TBDwaE1e2Xw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxu9zKxVhFFxiBzq6v67A18Msd1fZMhbrpXf1=NQAgceAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMRcRGTKJmPCr4MZsK613csJ2yXHZzoDFzMtDujui4-NVZkH1A@mail.gmail.com> <c3a3dccf-6398-e47b-79ba-34aaea410f33@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <c3a3dccf-6398-e47b-79ba-34aaea410f33@cisco.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 17:24:35 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxuRnNhaq9i1aDDnmniWpd9Awq9CwVUtC+fsMBiAtx+1SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxuRnNhaq9i1aDDnmniWpd9Awq9CwVUtC+fsMBiAtx+1SQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
Cc: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000643fbd05896c7a48"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/nXKaqlrbF9Jfn017yKp2-KHSZn4>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] (Rough) Consensus Call - No FQDN support in ice-sip-sdp
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 21:24:50 -0000

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 9:37 AM Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
wrote:

> On 5/21/19 1:01 AM, Suhas Nandakumar wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 8:19 PM Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> wrote:
>
>> There was a bit of discussion earlier about this and the understanding
>> was that RFC 8445 does not deal with FQDN or DNS resolution. RFC 8445 gets
>> a list of candidates with IP Addresses. FQDN resolution as well as the
>> format in which candidates are encoded would be a part of some other draft
>> such ice-sip-sdp or an extension.
>>
>
> [suhas] .. I don’t understand why FQDN resolution should be scoped in
> ice-sip-sdp whose main purposes is offer / answer negotiation and yes
> encoding provided candidates. I agree with Bernard and vote to move fqdn
> resolution outside ice-sip-sdp into a new draft
>
> I'm leaning towards that as well. Trying to rush an FQDN solution into
> ice-sip-sdp does not seem like a good idea, and we need to move this draft
> forward.
>
>
I agree that FQDN must be in a separate draft. It should not, however, be a
part of RFC 8445 since it is outside of scope for the draft.
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email