Re: [MMUSIC] HELP: Definition of Media Type suitable for SDP ?

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Tue, 04 June 2019 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A644C1201CC for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zP5OGowZC1Ao for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (outgoing-alum.mit.edu [18.7.68.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A127120388 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PaulKyzivatsMBP.localdomain (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x54J79va005263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:07:09 -0400
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <155922060388.22145.12090008162284261785.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5b944fc8-3f97-55e6-2faf-45bfd11c5837@alum.mit.edu> <122cfa2d-e1e6-18c9-5418-4e6fa1fe938f@alum.mit.edu> <3394C534-6B5E-446C-B797-FF6B0A1435BA@csperkins.org> <04d9a8a4-db77-84f5-47f2-585f3313cf60@alum.mit.edu> <fd87f0ab-83ac-d923-ba35-9766dd63d83a@nostrum.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <19d609a1-5358-23a4-5d2c-a9939c31cc54@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:07:09 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fd87f0ab-83ac-d923-ba35-9766dd63d83a@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/rHrC_FCjV-MFfyv9LP0yLiLOP0A>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] HELP: Definition of Media Type suitable for SDP ?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:07:14 -0000

OK, thanks. Then I guess it is 6838.

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 6/4/19 2:42 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> [as an individual]
> 
> On 6/4/19 1:22 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>> On 6/4/19 1:13 PM, Colin Perkins wrote:
>>>> On 4 Jun 2019, at 17:35, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>>> I'm working on resolving IESG comments on rfc4566bis. I need some 
>>>> help on this one:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/30/19 8:50 AM, Alexey Melnikov via Datatracker wrote:
>>>>>> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
>>>>>> draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-35: No Objection
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>>> In 3.1 “media types” need a Normative reference.
>>>>
>>>> I've always struggled on this. The "simple" answer to refer to 
>>>> RFC2046. That indeed defines the notion of two part names for media 
>>>> types, and the IANA registry for those. But it is really focused 
>>>> primarily on those things that can exist as body parts in email, 
>>>> sip, etc. While that same registry is used for streaming media, it 
>>>> seems clear that not everything in that registry is suitable for use 
>>>> as streaming media.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a more suitable reference for definition of the media types 
>>>> that SDP is concerned with?
>>>
>>>
>>> RFC 2046 is obsolete. I think the current version is RFC 6838.
>>>
>>> Aside from that, I’m not sure I understand the concern. SDP is a 
>>> general purpose signalling protocol and should be able to negotiate 
>>> any media type. Specific rules for framed media, such as RTP payload 
>>> formats, are described in Section 4.8 of RFC 6838, but those are a 
>>> detail that doesn’t affect SDP.
>>
>> Do you mean that it would be fine to use SDP to negotiate the 
>> streaming of multipart/mixed or text/plain over RTP? 
> 
> 
> As fine as it would be to send an email with a Content-Type of 
> "application/sdp".
> 
> If someone came along and somehow defined semantics for these, then the 
> syntax and registration processes would support that. But MIME doesn't 
> do anything to ensure semantic consistency: there are infinite ways to 
> send nonsense.
> 
> /a
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic