Re: [MMUSIC] Offer/Answer PT Questions - GitHub draft place holder

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

I think it is worth *considering* doing a 3264bis. Surely it could use 
it. OTOH it will open Pandora's box and probably become a relatively big 
project. (But I think not as big as 4566bis, and certainly not as big as 
3261bis would be.)

So maybe we just float the question to the wg: *if* we were to do a 
3264bis, what things need to be fixed? And of those, how many would be 
clarifications vs. those that would be functional changes?

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 2/25/16 2:57 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>Should we consider this an update to RFC 3264 or a new draft which
> updates PT only?
>
> Well, PT is what started the discussion :)
>
> Do you have a list of other things you think needs an update?
>
> Obviously, if there are lots of updates, we need to start considering a bis…
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
> __
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Christer Holmberg
> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I created a GitHub repo, and added an initial version of a draft,
>     containing my initially suggested text modification. We’ll update it
>     as we move along, and submit the draft when/if the community agrees
>     that is something we should do.
>
>     https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-oa-pt
>
>     (NOTE: It’s a personal repo)
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Christer
>