IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] The rtp-duplication related drafts

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 04 January 2013 02:29 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FDF21F8E33 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:29:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.083
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.083 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.520, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ln6psEt+I7iZ for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:29:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6A921F8E2E for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:29:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.44]) by qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jcnM1k0020xGWP85CeVJpo; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:29:18 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jeVH1k00v3ZTu2S3YeVH88; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:29:18 +0000
Message-ID: <50E63E7D.5050707@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:29:17 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940CDF9AB8@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940CDF9AB8@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1357266558; bh=SZzKv41Qiok2BMvhIo+w31CI7FzOYAtOPB4jJ5YxsmI=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=hF800Y5S+qAC5DXg9Q5wXJszt55Haegh4DNQOMOJSZCEA7ZgYQly/RUAdkyiw8AkH 7ta5jNG5HxmzHsgAN9hH2CPuzeyYQW36l5yNx9g9VDUllHej2cLZk/eQNa3p1LmtGG LXE3K0X95AUcl5H9VfOZsifUgpmI8xRgohduLRIupgGaRGclKDtLJSDFGdsuL9MsbS Cpz5ysx61rbJmbsdLEzQAKgWRzLysRcPUt6BGvhW0/gQxyWnNptPbplIcpdnPNGQqi o8ubapyrqCmtEpI4VfE6iazBcbIJ4CCxob35k5zw+QBgjmaqkY+0bKIalQmqaW+N9k eWpRKUyaEYRkg==
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] The rtp-duplication related drafts
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:29:22 -0000

Ali,

On 1/3/13 5:31 PM, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The following two drafts have been adopted by MMUSIC a while ago and the main draft discussing the RTP duplication issues is being finalized in AVTEXT (this was also adopted as a WG item a while ago). It is simply waiting for the WG to make a decision on the srcname proposal.
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication/
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-duplication-grouping/

I have a question about these:

Each example shows only one group. But couldn't there be multiple 
duplication groups?

If so, the current proposal has no mechanism for specifying separate 
duplication-delay for each group.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email