[MMUSIC] draft-dtls-sdp: making SDP dtls-id attribute value globally unique

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 23 November 2016 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A242F129D9D for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 05:26:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rUZRObdzC_Wr for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 05:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1FE6129D81 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 05:26:04 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-ec9d598000007ee2-a6-583598ea1446
Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.87]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 1E.69.32482.AE895385; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:26:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.16]) by ESESSHC023.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:25:47 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-dtls-sdp: making SDP dtls-id attribute value globally unique
Thread-Index: AQHSRY0Zm7E4Ny5+3k6qhS9FitvNAw==
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:25:47 +0000
Message-ID: <D45B6778.1371A%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.9.160926
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.16]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D45B67781371Achristerholmbergericssoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2J7uO7rGaYRBuf+cFtMXf6YxYHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGT3LzjEW9ElVvDzxlrWB8bFoFyMnh4SAicSVc3tYuhi5OIQE 1jFKnNy8lRHCWcwosWJeC1MXIwcHm4CFRPc/bZAGEQF1ia97e5hBwsIC3hInfwhAhIMk7qy4 xQhh60ncXbSUDcRmEVCV2P7lAjOIzStgLfHu3jQmEJtRQEzi+6k1YDazgLjErSfzmSDuEZBY suc8M4QtKvHy8T9WkFWiQDPX3A+DCCtK7DzbzgzRmiCx6P8TVojxghInZz5hmcAoNAvJ1FlI ymYhKYOIG0i8PzefGcLWlli28DWUrS+x8ctZRgjbWmLuwrUsyGoWMHKsYhQtTi1Oyk03MtZL LcpMLi7Oz9PLSy3ZxAiMk4NbfqvuYLz8xvEQowAHoxIP74Yy0wgh1sSy4srcQ4wSHMxKIryL pgGFeFMSK6tSi/Lji0pzUosPMUpzsCiJ85qtvB8uJJCeWJKanZpakFoEk2Xi4JRqYIyP7bFP 1TzXra+6JiD6jNR6IamvxWwuNQ4aHdPb2Ga08+bW6JbfX/Roem/nAt/9qlUhyt/2SuWyNylM d7meqDOha8bXK7wfboW+VL/8XPX4DI03ocq13C5O69ecO7L8+GnumUyaSVxumncTdNjSg4NW V7LvTnulujct7h6v6L5ZujPqzBjllViKMxINtZiLihMBwIXKso8CAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/xhQQaSNxZb74-jGcCwAvo9PcAcE>
Subject: [MMUSIC] draft-dtls-sdp: making SDP dtls-id attribute value globally unique
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:26:06 -0000

Hi,

Currently, draft-dtls-sdp defines that each endpoint defines a value (let’s call it X) that is a combination of the local fingerprint value and dtls-id value. The pair of X values (offerer and answerer) then identifies the DTLS association.

Some people have recently reviewed the draft, prior to publication request, and the procedures above seem to be difficult to understand - no matter how we have tried to clarify and re-word them.

Therefore, the authors suggest to mandate the dtls-id value globally unique (similar to ICE ufrags), and only the pair of dtls-id values (offerer and answerer) would then identity the DTLS associations (naturally, a change of fingerprint would still require a new DTLS association).

In addition, when an endpoint wants to create a new DTLS association, it always has to create a new local dtls-id value. Currently that is not needed if the fingerprint is changed, and people have had difficulties to understand that too.

So, we believe that the change to make the dtls-id value globally unique will make the procedures much easier and straight forward.

Regards,

Christer