IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Model-t] [EXT] Re: Review of draft-thomson-tmi

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Wed, 08 December 2021 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: model-t@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: model-t@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3219D3A08B3 for <model-t@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:15:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fiNRiOcecobn for <model-t@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:15:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D803A0893 for <model-t@iab.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:15:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id r11so11000457edd.9 for <model-t@iab.org>; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 10:15:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=172QlaPYk/cfSGRBHLEPdivGAevTbKqlFthIjojSB98=; b=ZQjd+LjGG8K84+BwKNWege9SF2Km/OmC/XwilTC5suduo+Fcx5wWbR2DKUpgTRHKsy VhU6Y4SKxi5ci1sfkLtrovUjlNlYMDrWbHKR7037uWZv2EreDCN5QcA0ZyxKFNxoPwNG wVu2TiycbOpk62I92aY74BwcSgS6ShjB+V7I/Z7YIk5rDULcednr/QDvu9kehPt7C8ze r/Bzu9kzT7QsRRcRaE/2gNyVIql+c/D6Pw73zHUMKaL8SVA4D/soq66fIrCRicmPUkad kIEqO8FeFVvpHMHgD1zNbDCZTJq/mRQuTwUkL0PqtfxxjXJ+YLPt2IJwyL/3tAwLb4dT Be2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=172QlaPYk/cfSGRBHLEPdivGAevTbKqlFthIjojSB98=; b=NStwgZnJ636q3nnutHwOePJcSLYL44wKNDxsRrFhN6vTe+9CLfOBVNNmTobSfMvYlm 8oF8vDJdsCDN9tq7S4d8Vzq2FxgPtCDi6/sA0LcG5hAIGOv6I4G1g0WgQ0lJjmqlcqT7 qrCVRC9nNMb8z6WNi/psaCGglIx/iWAWYJX8r3AdYlQJ+LnhiVkNAhTvUCJp6RPhZtb5 q/CjWOWEaZ7SKaZgBZCv597XvLxq06O7WW962ICTWYX5lOjBiNJwv3Uwz8k0Ec3N2v/j eYcK5vooj4DUXolHbiZ/puIKcK5WKlVGxFnFYIclbdvdwa3NAlCi7RDBsSAfl8I8ieQ2 6bsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533VwrWK7dN74I6z7F+ldiAzB35OP4cRICROGgRrIyFEtlKOL6st wSHkOCFVC8/FeK+194XyH46IZZVSrcwXpgwin8Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxoA1ncqM6ZBJCmDqi+SJVEcM95o/A0m2QGeynLlO44zo8XRSEpoEE99wLam1aPWj22hNGXqGzTWNniGAYtyS4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7d8b:: with SMTP id oz11mr9517784ejc.507.1638987300135; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 10:15:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <F2034CB3-D829-4C50-BC84-A89DE360FF7E@piuha.net> <1793552336.53819.1638947644889@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <CACsn0c=pKw6YpEVFC5Tw-h7YUD=BavvQFs3+qbaUZpjNWNs-pQ@mail.gmail.com> <2106155588.58495.1638969631021@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <2106155588.58495.1638969631021@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 13:14:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CACsn0ck9h9m05dAwWQ7Aamai=eWPviLgTOn_QOPiE2fBsjq4gA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
Cc: model-t@iab.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/model-t/khjhl2P24y8-q1YQMv7fMplOn3c>
Subject: Re: [Model-t] [EXT] Re: Review of draft-thomson-tmi
X-BeenThere: model-t@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of changes in Internet deployment patterns and their impact on the Internet threat model <model-t.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/model-t>, <mailto:model-t-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/model-t/>
List-Post: <mailto:model-t@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:model-t-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/model-t>, <mailto:model-t-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 18:15:07 -0000

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 8:20 AM Vittorio Bertola
<vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> wrote:

>
> No, device security is out of scope, but the choice of protocol architectures is directly influenced by whether you want to consider potential "endpoint intermediary" misbehaviour or not, which in turn will influence your take on whether hooks for other intermediaries in the conversation (in the network, as side services, however you want) are desirable or not. Yesterday someone was pointing out the work that the W3C is doing ( https://github.com/w3ctag/privacy-principles ), I still need to go through it but at first sight it looks like an interesting approach.

What's the difference between a coffeeshop, an ISP, and a corporate
network to an end device? If we make a protocol to prevent people
sending viruses over email, will it then stop them sending pictures of
Winnie the Pooh? Bytes are bytes after all.


-- 
Astra mortemque praestare gradatim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email