Re: [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:58 AM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Let’s also show the support for adopting this document on the MOPS WG
> mailing: sending a simple ‘I support the adoption’ is enough and I am sure
> that Jake will appreciate
>

I support adoption. This draft is certainly ready for the working group to
work on it.

Best,

Spencer

>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> -éric
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Mops <mops-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Leslie Daigle <
> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 21 January 2020 at 20:45
> *To: *"mops@ietf.org" <mops@ietf.org>
> *Cc: *Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
> *Subject: *[Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re:
> draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons
>
>
>
> Thanks, Jake, for putting together the follow ups from the IETF 106 MOPS
> meeting.
>
> I’m happy to see others have already started chiming in with comments.
>
> We had pretty strong consensus in the room to take this on as a WG item,
> and I’m happy to formally follow that up on the list here and now.
>
> If anyone *objects* to adoption of the document (
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01), please
> share your objection now.
>
> If there is no (unresolved) objection by the end of January 31, 2020, we
> will adopt this document as draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons .
>
> Thanks,
> Leslie.
>
> On 17 Jan 2020, at 17:26, Holland, Jake wrote:
>
> Hi Mops,
>
> I'm finally writing to follow up on draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy.
>
> I did a quick review of the video from the IETF 106 mops meeting:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_k340xT2jM
>
> I captured the comments I heard in a new notes section and
> updated the draft to -01, plus a few very minor editing tweaks.
> I was going to rename it to draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons, but
> I thought I'd wait until after the adoption call, to make sure it's
> confirmed on-list. (I think the data tracker is easier to use when
> you change names less often...)
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01
>
> I also wanted to say thanks to the folks who volunteered to co-author
> this draft. You 3 are BCC'd, and your contributions are very welcome.
>
> I also wanted to ask whether there's any particular topics you'll be
> working on, so we don't get multiple people writing to the same points?
>
> Regardless, for the moment the current version is here and I'm
> accepting pull requests :) :
> https://github.com/GrumpyOldTroll/ietf-mops-drafts
>
> Assuming the adoption call starts soon and is successful, we maybe
> should move to a WG-owned repo, but that's where it is for now.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Jake
>
> --
> Mops mailing list
> Mops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
>
> --
> ------------------------------
>
> Leslie Daigle
> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
> --
> Mops mailing list
> Mops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
>