Re: [Mops] Content steering work

"Ali C. Begen" <ali.begen@networked.media> Wed, 08 November 2023 11:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ali.begen@networked.media>
X-Original-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4517BC18770E for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 03:00:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=networked.media
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CjoSqyf-2AD1 for <mops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 03:00:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 187BBC15C2BE for <mops@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 03:00:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5441305cbd1so9188357a12.2 for <mops@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Nov 2023 03:00:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networked.media; s=google; t=1699441213; x=1700046013; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=DfcSz137JAlOhi3dx6QAD2PE+qZqmUkFrKo84Hf8E78=; b=cg6+H4By30udF/QJTqi7MxTPyzMLVN66KawvfWK18UCSXOQRoxuvmYG9VatwLqqScH hKbNCAnMkB/8n+XGmlSUo7CA54HkVTRrgLPF4ZwwkgmVjuHBsJcnluVT5puoamvohXpA Mz1kZYZft1ODQ842YnTqGF1AYlBwdRr3f+cF56Y/Fg+nUoGr+U5GOtky9vwOOyJ/5fnu CqihwWsHo31ndCywqD55l2jtLf43FPVD7fPYqH4UDFV9gkvQcCKwlz7RQCJfhxzwldfx RILV7T20fbbnFbSH7FRG26aGcJBb4o1T89wBRmY7x0tSi2eBXCtZKUlqwNtlVgBJRuiq 3flw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699441213; x=1700046013; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DfcSz137JAlOhi3dx6QAD2PE+qZqmUkFrKo84Hf8E78=; b=CQkQIIYt4dxjzVdkYP+QI8H89tnAasSiald9hfiIXeGzTL4w0sxY5ho+t6SVLa8anI aBbLQ8FrIn64IRnDNd39Lgw+Q+deNJbmyhAsoz6//nfppuAzwNYEWxhZMUI1nnd9lGSq jCOtG9YQcq5uR1uHr5HmhdzP7eYBUS8R4CFyACkPU06+q/nlTzyXvyl1EdSV6mxhW3R8 x+pyU+xLyfcFpNUZnJSyGgsOM+A7R6HgITk/1bBIYuV3aA/G3s3v4XwUyLFRQF+3ABxp Rkp+RLo3AlEwczS37cMyLE/9ok7AIrYP7SPRVOUehJoxol33dkMK8FHUeUj8GBTt4XFp OY/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxlfuVMSqDOTTRokL4427wmVye+WuHuHA9bmvDdbDrdujaxkYPJ +hRx5YjZu75RZuqPO1kvWLttSEwAAIHBEbtFvjOoHMXb
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGb26Xhh9SvtG6Uobfwt4LSIGYpZ0GrTqrgwl3M+xsQ5xgyJ7xR8AFhZNPJbpbH6RKaPjOKDg==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:870c:0:b0:53e:3b8f:8a58 with SMTP id i12-20020a50870c000000b0053e3b8f8a58mr1209352edb.11.1699441212244; Wed, 08 Nov 2023 03:00:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([62.168.35.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f14-20020a05640214ce00b0053db0df6970sm6452194edx.54.2023.11.08.03.00.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Nov 2023 03:00:11 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.200.91.1.1\))
From: "Ali C. Begen" <ali.begen@networked.media>
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB4966263E76E33226B807E364A9A8A@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 12:00:00 +0100
Cc: MOPS Working Group <mops@ietf.org>, Will Law <wilaw@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <05602836-5678-4F6B-BAC5-0967A6A86CC2@networked.media>
References: <CAA4Mczs-9e5HeG9suL+VnyxkvWA3gXMKa73yUR+KXQAPa+MvyQ@mail.gmail.com> <PH0PR11MB4966263E76E33226B807E364A9A8A@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.200.91.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mops/49ng3I98E7b4ctRDqOq2GkZPaKw>
Subject: Re: [Mops] Content steering work
X-BeenThere: mops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media OPerationS <mops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mops/>
List-Post: <mailto:mops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops>, <mailto:mops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 11:00:20 -0000

Ah definitely. If the group thinks this is a good direction and work item for mops, we can always revise the charter :) But, let’s what JT has to say and in the meantime, it would be nice to hear other opinions.

> On Nov 8, 2023, at 11:53, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> My reservation is only about whether it fits the charter...
>  Technical discussions on the topic are welcome to start on this mailing list, but adoption will require fitting the charter (and, I am sorry, but I have no time to check this week 😲 ...)
>  As usual, new work is welcome at the IETF (but processes must be followed – I cannot imagine myself writing these words!)
>  -éric
>  From: Mops <mops-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Ali C. Begen <ali.begen=40networked.media@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Date: Tuesday, 7 November 2023 at 14:04
> To: MOPS Working Group <mops@ietf.org>, Will Law <wilaw@akamai.com>
> Subject: [Mops] Content steering work
> At the YANA meeting on Sunday, there was a question in Will’s slides about unifying the content steering specs (at least getting the common parts out of the hls and dash specs and publishing them as a referencable spec). 
> 
> I had recommended mops for this work in the hls meeting we had few weeks ago. Yet the AD had some reservations about this work’s relation to mops. 
>  Given that mops is looking for new work, i would like to understand these reservations better. Should we discuss this on the list?
> 
> -acbegen
> Using iThumbs