Re: [Mops] [E] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons

[[e-mail]]

I support the adoption of the draft.

-Sanjay

From: Mops [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Leslie Daigle
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 2:45 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Kyle Rose <[e-mail]>
Subject: [E] [Mops] Confirming adoption consensus Re: draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons


Thanks, Jake, for putting together the follow ups from the IETF 106 MOPS meeting.

I’m happy to see others have already started chiming in with comments.

We had pretty strong consensus in the room to take this on as a WG item, and I’m happy to formally follow that up on the list here and now.

If anyone objects to adoption of the document (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Djholland-2Dmops-2Dtaxonomy-2D01&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=XniVbishGiO2Ao9hKqSc-hTVIWCi3T-x6GdHR4ZTgoM&m=aGr3Uwa_cj2EIQ6vtnRMFeM-V8XT3EUyYZg4qa_Uoo8&s=rGVZdNu_bautKrYn5A8oSIIDA1AxopQEOmIQ3md1EoI&e=>), please share your objection now.

If there is no (unresolved) objection by the end of January 31, 2020, we will adopt this document as draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons .

Thanks,
Leslie.

On 17 Jan 2020, at 17:26, Holland, Jake wrote:

Hi Mops,

I'm finally writing to follow up on draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy.

I did a quick review of the video from the IETF 106 mops meeting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_k340xT2jM<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.youtube.com_watch-3Fv-3D4-5Fk340xT2jM&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=XniVbishGiO2Ao9hKqSc-hTVIWCi3T-x6GdHR4ZTgoM&m=aGr3Uwa_cj2EIQ6vtnRMFeM-V8XT3EUyYZg4qa_Uoo8&s=8G-QfeRGPtCKrPPrn0hW4_MaI0y4t-pkh4FAoEqJCIU&e=>

I captured the comments I heard in a new notes section and
updated the draft to -01, plus a few very minor editing tweaks.
I was going to rename it to draft-ietf-mops-streaming-opcons, but
I thought I'd wait until after the adoption call, to make sure it's
confirmed on-list. (I think the data tracker is easier to use when
you change names less often...)
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jholland-mops-taxonomy-01<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Djholland-2Dmops-2Dtaxonomy-2D01&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=XniVbishGiO2Ao9hKqSc-hTVIWCi3T-x6GdHR4ZTgoM&m=aGr3Uwa_cj2EIQ6vtnRMFeM-V8XT3EUyYZg4qa_Uoo8&s=rGVZdNu_bautKrYn5A8oSIIDA1AxopQEOmIQ3md1EoI&e=>

I also wanted to say thanks to the folks who volunteered to co-author
this draft. You 3 are BCC'd, and your contributions are very welcome.

I also wanted to ask whether there's any particular topics you'll be
working on, so we don't get multiple people writing to the same points?

Regardless, for the moment the current version is here and I'm
accepting pull requests :) :
https://github.com/GrumpyOldTroll/ietf-mops-drafts<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_GrumpyOldTroll_ietf-2Dmops-2Ddrafts&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=XniVbishGiO2Ao9hKqSc-hTVIWCi3T-x6GdHR4ZTgoM&m=aGr3Uwa_cj2EIQ6vtnRMFeM-V8XT3EUyYZg4qa_Uoo8&s=2RvYO3Bi9Lz7Xh0jKc8W66ix02BVJCf19EVuMEFVzI0&e=>

Assuming the adoption call starts soon and is successful, we maybe
should move to a WG-owned repo, but that's where it is for now.

Thanks and regards,
Jake

--
Mops mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_mops&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=XniVbishGiO2Ao9hKqSc-hTVIWCi3T-x6GdHR4ZTgoM&m=aGr3Uwa_cj2EIQ6vtnRMFeM-V8XT3EUyYZg4qa_Uoo8&s=93KqSEKn02y6KCuD5IpH26cA6xidBTR0aD0dV1Iin3M&e=>

--

________________________________

Leslie Daigle
Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises

[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>