IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Moq] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dawkins-sdp-rtp-quic-questions-01.txt

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 26 October 2021 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: moq@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: moq@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5E43A13BD for <moq@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hreLrzYCE8GB for <moq@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x934.google.com (mail-ua1-x934.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::934]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AF583A11B6 for <moq@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x934.google.com with SMTP id ba32so1058190uab.6 for <moq@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=t//Awl9vkGd2MCOL/FBy0Cnvu6W/TPEH8kvjcWqc/bI=; b=HCAGdLQRMF5WqGo+vzVi0vKzn1x8FltgizyWlluZbvftplHvhhQQkP1TYP67Jw8nO8 Palas9RT/+MY6+iErStNah5D5IU3cqGzafCyT+hRdHdHF9VDar9X757Iyx7eWdFoYbvK 61Hxpd+qe+91v5O6vpnUzeCdrvedLXivCIpFmfNFMBw8n9lc5o5XlLQlqaRIaRexop/x FbO1mwDRZtVl2MxBomz+HLUNufGUQqTd4n5GZGPvRZciYmxZ4STiR18kYZBFCnZjBu1B rSSeT1n3oOjejqwVGIpXNFXwO8e64TZJZuYU06ldD3piuA2W8VTaU8NSDCyEGuTRomL0 QQ8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=t//Awl9vkGd2MCOL/FBy0Cnvu6W/TPEH8kvjcWqc/bI=; b=3sfISxi1dtNzK0OqPF/MHDF/7+mHbqW2Lb1Fn59r0XYJa8PaQk13596jfBNcxhsoI3 yYRDQ3MYY8lJPGB7kUr3ZQQhikjAPb0MmgWe0PoSDn1wWbJG+H893Rsla8E9I4+7NzcC QguqTgdDDcW+5xalFEsSNMnHbCwN2q0BXq43hSgpmvCh/hCE3J4BKPPGv1S0PQQqo/nN leXzhC0aMTko41H/M7maR5v9YWkR/WMQr74Aif0UMVKBE8H3PAUR/bCY774JEWvaUWKP W9I3QuAeiDC+JcTDaMx6BGk4lWYaqiHHFycxKymExTWL3eza5RbrtU9XUyb3UjYTN1Mj HNpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531e185lxMBHtrCKVmIYUb0EASG94BNk+SleT6EIcqk3FRoKBx18 9d2soTmb7sJXibWBYra6G7E8qlr73WPrqjD4s/3tP79U
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+RD8TLMDDSGPaQSAuidH4alxvmXfeP6ku65wYBL3iGtFHCq5yciPq7DJOjto2gXWTdSnc26Irn8bL2TAXN1g=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:290b:: with SMTP id cz11mr15754059vsb.38.1635284250542; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163518349400.19493.4114152406197548259@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <163518349400.19493.4114152406197548259@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:37:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-fP_mqMqL7k6Bi4VbQyswD3XHN7Vmvw0L7mRM379F8p6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: MOQ Mailing List <moq@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dc46cb05cf484811"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/moq/zVJ3NFJeDBOieAE508ndnaWyG5w>
Subject: [Moq] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dawkins-sdp-rtp-quic-questions-01.txt
X-BeenThere: moq@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media over QUIC <moq.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/moq>, <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/moq/>
List-Post: <mailto:moq@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/moq>, <mailto:moq-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 21:37:38 -0000

Dear MOQ subscribers,

Just to follow on James' excellent lead, I've also revised this draft,
which is an attempt to identify the requirements that RTP over QUIC will
place on SDP signaling for this type of media traffic.

As James said about our mutual draft, my understanding is that we're
expected to have conversations about "Media Over QUIC" on this mailing
list. If anyone has a different understanding, please let the mailing list
know, so that we can Do The Right Thing.

Otherwise, let's be thinking how to move this work forward in the IETF 112
timeframe.

Best,

Spencer

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:38 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-dawkins-sdp-rtp-quic-questions-01.txt
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-dawkins-sdp-rtp-quic-questions-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Spencer Dawkins and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-dawkins-sdp-rtp-quic-questions
Revision:       01
Title:          SDP Offer/Answer for RTP using QUIC as Transport - Design
Questions
Document date:  2021-10-25
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          13
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dawkins-sdp-rtp-quic-questions-01.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dawkins-sdp-rtp-quic-questions/
Html:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dawkins-sdp-rtp-quic-questions-01.html
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dawkins-sdp-rtp-quic-questions
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dawkins-sdp-rtp-quic-questions-01

Abstract:
   This document is a companion document to "SDP Offer/Answer for RTP
   using QUIC as Transport".  That document focuses on the description
   and registration of SDP "proto" attribute parameters with IANA, to
   allow applications that rely on SDP Offer/Answer to negotiate the
   QUIC protocol as an encapsulation for RTP.

   In writing that document, it became obvious that decisions about an
   appropriate SDP description would depend on decisions about the way
   RTP would be encapsulated in QUIC, and different proposals for those
   encapsulations had made different assumptions.  Given that none of
   these proposals have been adopted by an IETF working group yet, it's
   not appropriate to try to base a general-purpose set of "QUIC/RTP"
   IANA registrations on any one of them, so this document includes the
   questions that have come up, and (as discussions progress) suggested
   answers for those questions.




The IETF Secretariat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email