Re: [Mpls-interop] MPLS-TP OAM requirements - AIS/LockNotif - Can MIPs send "usolicited" OAM messages ?

Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl> Sun, 03 May 2009 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <hhelvoort@chello.nl>
X-Original-To: mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76513A6E95 for <mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 May 2009 16:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.288
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SqEEhEWzFYln for <mpls-interop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 May 2009 16:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep16-int.chello.at (viefep16-int.chello.at [62.179.121.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3263A6CA5 for <mpls-interop@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 May 2009 16:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge04.upc.biz ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep16-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090503231407.VRUS10095.viefep16-int.chello.at@edge04.upc.biz>; Mon, 4 May 2009 01:14:07 +0200
Received: from McAsterix.local ([24.132.228.153]) by edge04.upc.biz with edge id nBE61b00l3KDBhC04BE7WE; Mon, 04 May 2009 01:14:07 +0200
X-SourceIP: 24.132.228.153
Message-ID: <49FE253E.5060803@chello.nl>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 01:14:06 +0200
From: Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <49FDE174.7000904@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <49FDE174.7000904@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mpls-interop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Mpls-interop] MPLS-TP OAM requirements - AIS/LockNotif - Can MIPs send "usolicited" OAM messages ?
X-BeenThere: mpls-interop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hhelvoort@chello.nl
List-Id: IETF MPLS Interoperability Design Team <mpls-interop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop>, <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-interop>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-interop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-interop>, <mailto:mpls-interop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 23:12:44 -0000

Bonsoir Martin,

You wrote:

> as part of the discussion on AIS/Lock Notification,
> the server layer MEPs, detecting a fault/lock condition, should
> inform (the MEPs of) the client layers relying on that
> server layer and which are affected by the condition.
> 
> However as I understand it is not the MEP (sMEP) of the
> server layer that sends a notification to the client layers
> MEPs (cMEP) but the MIP (cMIP) of the client layer which
> is hosted on the same node than the MEP (sMEP).
> See the figure below (where the double dashed line is
> an LSP, and the ~ line represents an LSP nested in the
> other LSP.
> 
> +------+      +------+      +------+      +------+
> |      |------|      |------| cMIP |~~~~~~| cMEP |
> |      |      |      |      |  ^   |      |      |
> |      |      |      |      |  |   |      |      |
> |      |      |      |      |  |   |      |      |
> |      |======|      |======| sMEP |      |      |
> +------+      +------+      +------+      +------+

I modified the figure to align with what you wrote.

> Therefore can MIPs send OAM messages without having priorly received one
> or did I miss something?

No, a MIP can only respond to messages it receives from a MEP
that has the same MEG level, i.e. exists in the same path.

In your figure the cMIP ignores messages sent by sMEP.

Cheers, Huub.

-- 
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...