Re: [mpls-tp] Status of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlv

Malcolm

Note 1 below accords with my recollection of the situation.

There are some drafts that seem to have incorporated the ACH TLV, but my 
understanding accords with the note below. The h/w designers (in a 
number of companies) have said that they would find them difficult and 
thus ACH TLV should be dropped from those drafts.

- Stewart

On 11/11/2010 01:54, Malcolm.BETTS@zte.com.cn wrote:
>
> I am confused by the statement that we need to discuss the status of 
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlvon the list.
>
> During discussion late August/early September in the context of the 
> RFC vs ITU Recommendations dependancy table the following statement 
> was made:
>
> 1. draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlv
>    This draft has expired and we do not intend to keep it
>    updated, instead definitions of TLVs for the associated
>    channel will be defined in the appropriate specification.
>    It is also not referenced by G.7712
>
> Therefore the draft was removed from the dependance table.
>
> Has the status changed?
>
> Regards,
>
> Malcolm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-tp mailing list
> mpls-tp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp

-- 
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html