IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls-tp] Status of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlv

Malcolm.BETTS@zte.com.cn Thu, 11 November 2010 01:54 UTC

Return-Path: <malcolm.betts@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A5B3A68F2 for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:54:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xyk92T8rESck for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9DB3A68C5 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 20595764009499; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:51:51 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.32.0.74] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 14898.764009499; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:50:53 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse3.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id oAB1suTM001950 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:54:56 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from Malcolm.BETTS@zte.com.cn)
To: mpls-tp@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OF6235F1E2.CDB94AAF-ON852577D8.000A112B-852577D8.000A818D@zte.com.cn>
From: Malcolm.BETTS@zte.com.cn
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:54:48 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2010-11-11 09:54:49, Serialize complete at 2010-11-11 09:54:49
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000A818A852577D8_="
X-MAIL: mse3.zte.com.cn oAB1suTM001950
Subject: [mpls-tp] Status of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlv
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:54:30 -0000

I am confused by the statement that we need to discuss the status of 
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlv on the list.

During discussion late August/early September in the context of the RFC vs 
ITU Recommendations dependancy table the following statement was made:

1. draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ach-tlv
    This draft has expired and we do not intend to keep it
    updated, instead definitions of TLVs for the associated
    channel will be defined in the appropriate specification.
    It is also not referenced by G.7712

Therefore the draft was removed from the dependance table.

Has the status changed?

Regards,

Malcolm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email