IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls-tp] draft-boutros-mpls-tp-performance

Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl> Tue, 06 April 2010 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <hhelvoort@chello.nl>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D583A68E8 for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 05:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.313
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.313 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.372, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Me8fd0FKw0JN for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 05:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep13-int.chello.at (viefep13-int.chello.at [62.179.121.33]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7070B3A68AA for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 05:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge03.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep13-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20100406124254.OOHD14401.viefep13-int.chello.at@edge03.upcmail.net> for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 14:42:54 +0200
Received: from McAsterix.local ([24.132.217.64]) by edge03.upcmail.net with edge id 2Cit1e0331Px1NY03Ciuvx; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:42:54 +0200
X-SourceIP: 24.132.217.64
Message-ID: <4BBB2C4D.4090908@chello.nl>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:42:53 +0200
From: Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mpls-tp@ietf.org
References: <C7DF483F.1BCF7%tom.nadeau@bt.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7DF483F.1BCF7%tom.nadeau@bt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=6UHAxsHwKCW0savQ7OVzrMBW5xvCzGO/qK2+m6qSwq4= c=1 sm=0 a=ZBxgcNb7e9sA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=B2zkrMephwfbyy7wyCEA:9 a=fpCcrpZ7h27IcSG2ursjo7OmcjcA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=JfD0Fch1gWkA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] draft-boutros-mpls-tp-performance
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hhelvoort@chello.nl
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:42:59 -0000

Hello Tom,

You wrote:

>      Why have you guys decided to invent a new protocol for performance
> measurements versus using what is defined in RFC4656 (IPPM) and perhaps
> re-encapsulating it for MPLS-TP purposes?

This protocol already exists for a long time.
So it is *not* an invention but re-use.

Regards, Huub.


> On 4/5/10 5:08 AM, "Stewart Bryant"<stbryant@cisco.com>  wrote:
>
>> Vishwas
>>
>> Thank you for reviewing draft-boutros-mpls-tp-performance
>>
>>   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-frost-mpls-tp-loss-delay-00 is a more
>> robust protocol for measuring loss/delay and is the draft that I would
>> prefer to move forward with.
>>
>> - Stewart


-- 
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email