Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-00.txt
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Fri, 11 March 2011 19:13 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438603A6867; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:13:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G1G5tZuHkifu; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:13:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808143A692A; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so3436782vxg.31 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:14:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hGvMLrqnfDT5Md1LdED+ehD8g+nQWAU3R3U/eBsRAcs=; b=GdG4thn6MIrO/mPJX1qjVlh6rNDi5CGVW9g12aQfnvIukUeyEUDv8iXCyeRShbPN3g C8nutqTdt9YCQS/Vu7boh3ZVaRqyeREOeEFHKJSw6AJTbckzdSWzzusxaQHlCWdRu4WP 3xUmKdIodPGXO6GYCtsPt1cKrCjf/LKiclgk8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=pJh0kPAvixjbHbsmiMwq5URY9OlMIi5TdLUX2zLYa4WhHo/R/bFz98ifeKo1VaKkD3 Ii5JbmgLBMlOK3XNWgdGC8Y2sM4Pas/+hBgJPTZdYKn0bXiKSATdUE+GBp+6DMbKZGsn CR+IHdU9YC2XlhMBueJ3eNHqnML8SSdSor5bE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.159.3 with SMTP id wy3mr14155643vdb.289.1299870865619; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:14:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.169.35 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:14:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D7A2439.6010508@cisco.com>
References: <AANLkTikcnCa5DQZyGgD_QawiQ_57KKA4BXQm7iRRayKA@mail.gmail.com> <4D5E9442.3030101@cisco.com> <AANLkTikmTjBZgtxNQRrAbBVQEmEKFAvyvAapk7Qbdf9O@mail.gmail.com> <4D7A2439.6010508@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:14:25 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTim+hqNFHi9xwuzG5_2qoKztEn9SJA9TDh-S-XUo@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
To: Luca Martini <lmartini@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec53f97973306bd049e39c525"
Cc: lihan@chinamobile.com, mpls@ietf.org, pwe3 <pwe3@ietf.org>, HUANG Feng F <Feng.f.Huang@alcatel-sbell.com.cn>, mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:13:08 -0000
Dear Luca, thank you for bringing draft-nadeau-pwe3-vccv-2-01 to my attention. I'll send my comments to it in a separate e-mail. I'll have to miss another opportunity to discuss your proposal in a meeting. Please add my comments below to my earlier expressed WG LC comments: - the draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-00 depends on any solution that addresses applicability of GAL in PW VCCV, e.g. solution proposed in draft-nadeau-pwe3-vccv-2-01; - the draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-00 needs to mention such dependency and refer to any existing proposal; - I believe that the draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-00 can be advanced in lock with document that addresses use of GAL in PW VCCV. Regards, Greg On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Luca Martini <lmartini@cisco.com> wrote: > Greg , > Some > > On 02/18/11 11:15, Greg Mirsky wrote: > > Dear Luca, > > I see at least two issues: > > > > * use of GAL for PW, in my view, is another VCCV CC type that has > > to be negotiated as described in RFC 5085. > > > These are valid points, but this document in question does not define, > not discussed VCCV. > We have since posted a draft that proposes a new VCCV mode , and we > welcome comments regarding that document. > (draft-nadeau-pwe3-vccv-2-01.txt) > > > * use of GAL creates ambiguous situation when PW CW is used. The > > benefit from extending GAL in PW, as I see, is for PWs that are > > not required to use PW CW. That might be a good enough reason to > > update RFC 5586 as proposed in the document but we must address > > use cases of GAL in PWs that require presence PW CW. If we > > prohibit or even discourage use of GAL for these PWs that have > > PW VCCV as native Associated Channel, then architecture of ACh > > for MPLS-TP PW not simplified as result of adopting the proposal. > > > > Regard > Greg, > The GAL is basically a notifier that the packet following the end of the > MPLS label stack, is explicitly defined as a G-ACH format. > Normally the packet would be decoded as an IP packet , unless the last > label on the stack indicated otherwise. > > The GAL can certainly be applied to a PW OAM packet on a PW that uses > the CW, and this document does not define that , nor restricts it. > > The scope of this document is limited to removing an unnecessary > restriction in rfc5586, hence this comment not applicable to this > document. > > Thanks. > Luca > > > s, > > Greg > > > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Luca Martini <lmartini@cisco.com > > <mailto:lmartini@cisco.com>> wrote: > > > > Greg, > > > > Sorry, but I do not remember the point you mention. > > Can you explain again here ? > > Thanks. > > Luca > > > > > > On 02/17/11 23:47, Greg Mirsky wrote: > > > Dear Authors and All, > > > prior to the meeting in Bejing and acceptance of this proposal as > WG > > > document Luca and I agreed that use of GAL with PW VCCV presents a > > > problem. > > > I was not attending the IETF-79, nor I found discussion of this > > issue > > > in the minutes. I think that this issue should be specified, > > > explained. In my view, this document updates not only RFC 5586 > > > but RFC 5085 too. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Greg > > > > > > Comment to draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-00.txt > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Luca Martini > > <lmartini@cisco.com <mailto:lmartini@cisco.com> > > > <mailto:lmartini@cisco.com <mailto:lmartini@cisco.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > Greg, > > > > > > You are correct , the proposed update does not propose any > > changes > > > to VCCV. > > > However the problem with vccv is not as simple as to ask for > > a new > > > code point from IANA. > > > Given the good amount of discussion on this point, we should > > > probably have a discussion in Beijing. > > > > > > Luca > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/29/2010 05:07 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote: > > >> Dear Authors, > > >> I think that proposed update of the Section 4.2. RFC 5586 > > makes it possible > > >> to use GAL on MPLS-TP PW that uses Control Word. I consider > > it to be > > >> conflict between PW VCCV CC types because use of GAL is not > > negotiated > > >> through PW VCCV negotiation. To avoid such situation I > propose: > > >> > > >> - in Section 5 request IANA to assign new CC Type "MPLS > > Generic > > >> Associated Channel Label" > > >> - assign precedence to new CC Type that affects Section > > 7 RFC 5085 > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Greg > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> mpls mailing list > > >> mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> <mailto:mpls@ietf.org > > <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>> > > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mpls mailing list > > > mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > > > > > >
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-… Greg Mirsky
- [mpls-tp] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-0… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls-tp] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-… Luca Martini
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-… Luca Martini
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-… venkatesan mahalingam
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-m… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-mpls-tp-… Robert Rennison
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-m… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-m… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-m… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-m… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-m… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-m… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls-tp] [PWE3] [mpls] WG LC draft-lm-pwe3-m… Curtis Villamizar