[mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions
Velan S <velantechie@gmail.com> Tue, 01 March 2011 06:49 UTC
Return-Path: <velantechie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118903A6DB2 for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:49:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HcCZD3rIeq5O for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:48:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E695C3A6D75 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so4816373wyb.31 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:48:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ve5uZqQM6Q3NCcQkPF1AjE414UWQkZLLTHi+zfsOFtU=; b=O0Jx8ZD5R3Zwk7MVWyYkaTPO8m79dbxgriOHH45zeLPVNFu8pGpNplXH41t1N8buBv oqvoc/b6rmbdhZuNgc4YYSqMgtEnqPCyKF+TqaO2d+yJt457W/laXQaD9iGleKQi4WZQ yFGLu9yqqGQs1uvMmiwuR4I5mw67CXdPG6h0s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=CY0AxjS7fKQZHsy9eqkDbgDdisaMoy13og15PF0Ec7I+nMkmFF4cBfzDhKWDf5fBoZ T750pqxWiQSQfMNqlRu7TOAoRR811WpHR1L7hYguN6WFSL48uNEuLHXfi9vacWKlsB4E ywZaQb4Ne1JFe5ek7LHOu4X3Y4b75Wh3k4J08=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.143.66 with SMTP id t2mr5770284wbu.83.1298962111305; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:48:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.11.133 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:48:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:48:31 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikqgFVrFaOp1Q4P0vKm9F1pZu+VC54NFj-P_zMT@mail.gmail.com>
From: Velan S <velantechie@gmail.com>
To: mpls-tp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636832f1a3898ea049d662f0e"
Subject: [mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:49:18 -0000
Hi Experts, I quickly wanted to check with you all, Can both, MPLS-TP LSP and traditional MPLS LSP, exist in a LSR? If both can exist, there is possibility of merging of these LSPs at a LSR. How can we detect such merging LSPs? Thanks in advance. S.Velan
- [mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions Velan S
- Re: [mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions neil.2.harrison
- Re: [mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions David Allan I
- Re: [mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions Velan S