Re: [mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions

Velan S <velantechie@gmail.com> Wed, 02 March 2011 05:13 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Mx5ndoCb0YkXIX9aJ2gpbcGZJq4MQlPHox8JKQfhS9sCo7rUnZjvtEgnBTrrpN4CRK apH60VUY68Vk+FXctepdiRpixonAqS9lBxArm6KUpZXDkiIWTD7cs7Er0uXxBRVK4Ykh 48mMYJkJkScrm4j/Du3suXsvAalzwJLkHHfpo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD51CFB47441@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
References: <AANLkTikqgFVrFaOp1Q4P0vKm9F1pZu+VC54NFj-P_zMT@mail.gmail.com> <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD51CFB47441@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:14:55 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikS=k021vot_wwHztWFDAuT_+Nrep4M0BOEK1W=@mail.gmail.com>
From: Velan S <velantechie@gmail.com>
To: David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="90e6ba47644956f8af049d78feb9"
Cc: "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions
Precedence: list

Hi David and NH,

Thanks for detailed points on this item.  I will investigate how this
mis-merge can be detected from the "See section".

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:04 PM, David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>wrote:

>  HI:
>
> First I beleive it is safe to assume both TP and traditional LSPs will
> exist in an LSR.
> If no OAM messages are running on one of the LSPs, a mis-merge cannot be
> detected.
>
> If OAM is run on both what a node would see is an "unexpected
> encapsulation". See section 3.5.2 of the CC-CV-RDI draft...
>
> I hope that helps
> Dave
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Velan S
> *Sent:* Monday, February 28, 2011 10:49 PM
>
> *To:* mpls-tp@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions
>
>   Hi Experts,
>
> I quickly wanted to check with you all,
>
> Can both,  MPLS-TP LSP and traditional MPLS LSP, exist in a LSR?  If both
> can exist, there is possibility of merging of these LSPs at a LSR.  How can
> we detect such merging LSPs?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> S.Velan
>
>

[mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions Velan S
Re: [mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions neil.2.harrison
Re: [mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions David Allan I
Re: [mpls-tp] MPLS-TP LSP questions Velan S