Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] New draft-vkst-mpls-tp-te-mib-00 draft for review

"Vijayanand C - ERS, HCL Tech" <vijayc@hcl.com> Mon, 28 February 2011 07:54 UTC

Return-Path: <vijayc@hcl.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659503A6AD4 for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:54:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.947, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RELAY_IS_203=0.994, SARE_SUB_OBFU_OTHER=0.135]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BaStv-ms-C5X for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:54:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gws08.hcl.com (gws08.hcl.com [203.105.186.26]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE643A6AC8 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:54:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chn-hclin-ht02.CORP.HCL.IN (10.249.64.36) by CHN-HCLIN-EDGE4.HCL.COM (10.249.64.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.254.0; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:24:27 +0530
Received: from CHN-HCLT-CASHT1.HCLT.CORP.HCL.IN (10.108.45.33) by chn-hclin-ht02.CORP.HCL.IN (10.249.64.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:25:04 +0530
Received: from CHN-HCLT-EVS07.HCLT.CORP.HCL.IN ([fe80::f46b:fdf2:3218:985d]) by CHN-HCLT-CASHT1.HCLT.CORP.HCL.IN ([::1]) with mapi; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:25:04 +0530
From: "Vijayanand C - ERS, HCL Tech" <vijayc@hcl.com>
To: venkatesan mahalingam <venkatflex@gmail.com>, "Kannan.Sampath@aricent.com" <Kannan.Sampath@aricent.com>, "aldrin.ietf@gmail.com" <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>, "tnadeau@lucidvision.com" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:25:03 +0530
Thread-Topic: [mpls] New draft-vkst-mpls-tp-te-mib-00 draft for review
Thread-Index: AcvW9oRAM9fFSJ7ESF26LiKCHkjL5AAI2t0A
Message-ID: <66E3DDEEA70F0D469D1FFE238526B6ED3E446EE737@CHN-HCLT-EVS07.HCLT.CORP.HCL.IN>
References: <AANLkTimb3SCx7=xsJxG3-O=kfnECRwqGPqzm79+M8cCB@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimb3SCx7=xsJxG3-O=kfnECRwqGPqzm79+M8cCB@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_66E3DDEEA70F0D469D1FFE238526B6ED3E446EE737CHNHCLTEVS07H_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] [mpls] New draft-vkst-mpls-tp-te-mib-00 draft for review
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 07:54:14 -0000

Hi venkatesh and authors,
This draft specifies that for bidirectional LSPs there will be two cross-connects with different mplsXCIndex but unique mplsXCLspId.
Are you saying thsat the mplsXCLspId has to be globally unique ( rfc3813 says it's the mplsLSPID  which rfc 3811 says is the two byte LSPID in the case of RSVP-TE LSPs) and be used to tie up the forward and reverse cross connect entries ?


You have also used the mplsXCLspId in the mplsTunnelXCPointer filed of the mplsTunnelTable

(mplsTunnelXCPointer          =
                                 mplsXCLspId.4.0.0.0.1.1.0.4.0.0.0.12,
)
 The XCPointer usually holds the index of the XC entry. ( xcindex,insegindex,outsegindex). For mpls-tp bidirectional LSPs are you mandating the use of mplsXClspid in the XCPointer implicitly makign it one of the index fields of the XCEntry ?

Regards
Vijay
From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of venkatesan mahalingam
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 8:51 AM
To: mpls; mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] New draft-vkst-mpls-tp-te-mib-00 draft for review

Hi Team,
We have uploaded the MPLS-TP TE MIB draft last week into IETF repository.

This document provides an enhancement to the RFC-3812 for managing the Traffic Engineering tunnels
for MPLS based transport networks in IP and Non-IP operator environments.

Please review the draft and provide your valuable comments/suggestions.

A URL of the draft is:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-vkst-mpls-tp-te-mib-00.txt

--
Best Regards,
Venkatesan Mahalingam.

________________________________
::DISCLAIMER::
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------