[mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5919 (2475)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 19 August 2010 07:37 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E385E3A6864 for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.253, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MH4zXUUW8BuW for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA5E3A68BB for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E19CEE06A3; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: rajiva@cisco.com, pmohapat@cisco.com, chenying220@huawei.com, bobthomas@alum.mit.edu, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian.farrel@huawei.com, swallow@cisco.com, loa@pi.nu
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100819073740.E19CEE06A3@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:37:40 -0700
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, ah@TR-Sys.de, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5919 (2475)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 07:37:07 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5919, "Signaling LDP Label Advertisement Completion". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5919&eid=2475 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Section: 5.3,1st para Original Text ------------- When an LDP speaker receives a Label Request message for a Typed | Wildcard FEC (e.g., a particular FEC Element Type) from a peer, the LDP speaker determines the set of bindings (as per any local filtering policy) to advertise to the peer for the FEC type specified by the request. [...] Corrected Text -------------- When an LDP speaker receives a Label Request message for a Typed | Wildcard FEC (i.e., a particular FEC Element Type) from a peer, the LDP speaker determines the set of bindings (as per any local filtering policy) to advertise to the peer for the FEC type specified by the request. [...] Notes ----- The parenthetical clause does not give an example, it gives an explanation; therefore, to avoid confusion, s!e.g.!i.e.! Note: Same issue as addressed by EID=2473 for RFC 5918. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5919 (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-end-of-lib-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Signaling LDP Label Advertisement Completion Publication Date : August 2010 Author(s) : R. Asati, P. Mohapatra, E. Chen, B. Thomas Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5919 (2475) RFC Errata System