Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates

Loa,

I appreciate the time the authors have put in to identify and resolve issues
with the original document. Always good to apply polish to WG products, and so
this should be run through the WG to update RFC 7271.

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: 22 February 2016 09:49
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt
draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-
> updates
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-
> updates as an MPLS working group document.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
> 
> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
> 
> All the authors and contributors has stated on the mpls wg mailing list
> that they are unaware of any IPRs that relates to this document.
> 
> /Loa
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls