[mpls] Correction - Re: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Mon, 22 February 2016 12:18 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7ED91A0169; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 04:18:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uB37CBwYh5QV; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 04:18:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A16081A039C; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 04:18:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (unknown [112.205.75.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E603F180158C; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:17:59 +0100 (CET)
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <56CAD97E.3040904@pi.nu>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <56CAFC5E.6080409@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:17:34 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56CAD97E.3040904@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/x0A0-0Tt4qWye1xmH6hP1K6T8Aw>
Cc: "draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org" <draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Correction - Re: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:18:10 -0000
(blush) Working Group, This was to early, we are in the middle of the MPLS-RT review, and we need to finish that before we start the poll - I apologize for my mistake! What happened was that I prepare the mails in advance, and this (fumbled fingered) got sent to early. When we have converged on the MPLS-RT review comments I will restart the poll. /Loa On 2016-02-22 17:48, Loa Andersson wrote: > Working Group, > > This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps- > updates as an MPLS working group document. > > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working > group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical > motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that > the document should not be adopted as a working group document. > > There are no IPR disclosures against this document. > > All the authors and contributors has stated on the mpls wg mailing list > that they are unaware of any IPRs that relates to this document. > > /Loa
- [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Adrian Farrel
- [mpls] Correction - Re: Poll to see if we have co… Loa Andersson