Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label

Sri <sriganeshkini@gmail.com> Thu, 16 November 2017 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sriganeshkini@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CF512969E; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:02:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fbv8-VVPni6h; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:02:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC10126D73; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:02:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id b189so1520890wmd.5; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:02:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bni3iw2gHyAF4oGw2zWH92V91z/Ged84MlKnDxVBVic=; b=IRMJx7pB/PisV+xdI9zbhCFcxobovrL06a/6/ogfonD2dxlBT3jOlEbTblkQr42wKQ 5TH4/WPMj2cekBCdjL3RhxVv4n1P/aViwOGjKhzSuVamFvmILBqYrtq4Vfm65qLXpdSY yccdtTCXJMa3kffd1Y5sayEll4V6P32F+sRJa87F6ep75Cy1xSKiSxnVjoQlK/Op5x2O ivw3T5CLtxth3Hsnj2fu2da00bc/e1+sYlzcb5ybP3CvfX9lxoolkLJ4SbE99pOFKcE2 qDPT3iXichVzhz0QugHO/yUBkXCmtM1ibTJ/lXCJXuLdgKZMkMarpyiExb3RRCrR3kuN +Kqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bni3iw2gHyAF4oGw2zWH92V91z/Ged84MlKnDxVBVic=; b=QsHU9Em1w+RJxPThiVsutmKJeoChoU+Zrp+sot2AqLUG4JdBnib8zxM71GmCzOskG/ LkuHGDsdNkJa/wmnDHTFJ0PISUCDpTxASW1vLUrxWdCKqrhfqhOlgQVR5sB9i+cqge/+ LspmupzCRyfA/QjhhH51lLL/bbL32cy36FWJH77nyIZeSGqYfOxw648wNnCkyCD6ACH8 I+/puDtbJ6/nscwKPwryn5yM5B83pepit0VArWiI0vRvL22eYKSxD+OrbQMH4kTve1GO nqpCtVmMkCCK/857w/oNC8cU+a8ur/wYKmLu//p4obKe68E5Gr9gs9nNM6IrlXgEd8T9 oFvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX71/UxivfqBQzjua0hJ+lUT3sq8prCzEFpL5MISEE3O4qKmKI0l cOY9LhI+X1skF+bboITxAwmK7n7HXhEHPRoFh5Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaFiEnu7pDT4OUt/erVeJqagMINBwgRi9B05K1QLv6n5J+KbRFKb4Ya/QBAQQnP3lTtwp9BKvB9L3s5W3Wd4hI=
X-Received: by 10.80.165.41 with SMTP id y38mr3649697edb.72.1510851724592; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:02:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.141.29 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:01:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE3047D4CE@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <c9d5de0a-7d70-2ae0-b6b0-6e30f5ee3ba3@pi.nu> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE3047D4CE@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
From: Sri <sriganeshkini@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:01:33 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOndX-sfFKW+y72--fMOy9kmNyYFrg9FAkgPRJMT1m_Lo8DDtw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
Cc: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c4f045a5f06055e1c9471"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/3EqM1IoX5_u0-hwppQvQefT66I8>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:02:10 -0000

Hello,

I am not aware of any IPR related to the draft.

Xu, my understanding is that IPR on approaches that are rejected need not
be declared.

Thanks
Sri

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> wrote:

>
> Hi cochairs,
>
> I'm aware an IPR related to section 10.1. Single EL at the bottom of the
> stack. This approach is considered and but is rejected in the current
> version. Hence I wonder whether such IPR should be declared as well.
>
> Best regards,
> Xiaohu
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> 徐小虎 Xuxiaohu
> M:+86-13910161692
> E:xuxiaohu@huawei.com
> 产品与解决方案-网络战略与业务发展部
> Products & Solutions-Network Strategy & Business Development Dept
>
> *发件人: *Loa Andersson
> *收件人: *mpls<mpls@ietf.org>
> *抄送: *mpls-chairs<mpls-chairs@ietf.org>;draft-ietf-mpls-spring-
> entropy-label<draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@ietf.org>
> *主题: *[mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
> *时间: *2017-11-16 11:16:49
>
> Working Group,
>
> We are currently preparing draft draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
> for a second wglc.
>
> Part of this preparation is to do a final IPR poll.
>
> Note that we opted to repeat the IPR poll even though we did an IPR poll
> at first wglc, there are two reasons (1) it is 18 months since the first
> wglc and, (2) my archive of the responses from the last IPR poll is
> (blush) not complete or they are broken.
>
> This mail is to start the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There are three IPR disclosures against draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-
> label.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
> /Loa
>   mpls wg co-chair
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>