Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 16 November 2017 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EF51292FC; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 01:39:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QdIzs29gEPxq; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 01:39:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A261126C2F; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 01:39:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12443; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1510825160; x=1512034760; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Ii6t2uFqG2LKW6sL7vAwt2nUsVdcOFS7CzLO9QQoJp0=; b=hwgSw3Ee8QuL3nQKHoasvof4W8x2++IyuezsuSRatf1Q658CCgnTZcRR 05WdN3Ge1yGPupaUkdgZVmT7qMS80Zsjb++gH1ujgms14lVPtYfuwiocW o203VQnoXtRC5+HANaXbkkK4cPdj8vz7bATGg2OoYtPRUeV+EH4EmRP34 I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CvAgCQXA1a/5FdJa0WBUMZAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgkRyZG4nB4N4mT+BfZEWhUkQggEKGAEKhRgCGoR7QBcBAQEBAQEBAQFrKIUeAQEBAQMBASEKPgMGBQ4CAgEGAhEDAQIoAwICAhkMCxQJCAIEAQ0FG4klZBCFHIZUnWiCJ4sTAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAUFgy+CB4M+gyuEZQERAgEkEQkWgl+CYwWKS4kZjlcClQiCFYYKiymWAwIRGQGBOAEgATaBA3F6FUmCZBOCSRyBZ3eKHIERAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,402,1505779200"; d="scan'208,217";a="315129101"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2017 09:38:57 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAG9cuut000991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:38:56 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:38:56 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:38:55 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
Thread-Index: AQHTXolQRV3XpH61aUuJiq3/TA3IOKMW1UwA///rA4A=
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:38:55 +0000
Message-ID: <D632C604.D928A%acee@cisco.com>
References: <c9d5de0a-7d70-2ae0-b6b0-6e30f5ee3ba3@pi.nu> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE3047D4CE@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE3047D4CE@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.122.132]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D632C604D928Aaceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/s4DwYflqK5CGZfep7wJIKtyLPfM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:39:22 -0000

As a contributor, I’m not aware of any IPR on this draft other than the one referenced below.
Thanks,
Acee

From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Xiaohu Xu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com<mailto:xuxiaohu@huawei.com>>
Date: Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 12:53 AM
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>
Cc: mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>>, draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label


Hi cochairs,

I'm aware an IPR related to section 10.1. Single EL at the bottom of the stack. This approach is considered and but is rejected in the current version. Hence I wonder whether such IPR should be declared as well.

Best regards,
Xiaohu



________________________________
徐小虎 Xuxiaohu
M:+86-13910161692<tel:+86-13910161692>
E:xuxiaohu@huawei.com<mailto:xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
产品与解决方案-网络战略与业务发展部
Products & Solutions-Network Strategy & Business Development Dept

发件人: Loa Andersson
收件人: mpls<mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>
抄送: mpls-chairs<mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>>;draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label<draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@ietf.org>>
主题: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
时间: 2017-11-16 11:16:49

Working Group,

We are currently preparing draft draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
for a second wglc.

Part of this preparation is to do a final IPR poll.

Note that we opted to repeat the IPR poll even though we did an IPR poll
at first wglc, there are two reasons (1) it is 18 months since the first
wglc and, (2) my archive of the responses from the last IPR poll is
(blush) not complete or they are broken.

This mail is to start the IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There are three IPR disclosures against draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-
label.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.


/Loa
  mpls wg co-chair
--


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>
Senior MPLS Expert
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls