[mpls] For Review: Proposed Liaison Response to SG11
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 08 March 2024 15:37 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA88C14F700; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 07:37:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JzlA1VlUA0dv; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 07:37:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5E39C14F5EA; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 07:37:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 428FbBoD005282; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 15:37:11 GMT
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAC14604A; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 15:37:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428494604B; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 15:37:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 15:37:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([85.255.234.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 428Fb9pP015280 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Mar 2024 15:37:10 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: 'Scott Mansfield' <scott.mansfield@ericsson.com>, mpls-ads@ietf.org
References: <02c501da70ad$60b838f0$2228aad0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <02c501da70ad$60b838f0$2228aad0$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:37:10 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <03c701da716e$7d056de0$771049a0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQDewqt5mJO5xNNsDV/9WzEaTMKdHrMj25GQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 85.255.234.148
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=i9brELlkT3hTYbjGuPqtImVwFcM6EuBgueF6gZchztI=; b=X9V MiRy0hyKc8JW48XxFzjfZqMJUFTsl9mroKwhrkrgguLzogqFTPnqqnfjIp3LGsoE a6z21CAMipjM857KyV85Ix1LQoUZEbix7TNd9y9/9GH6mkiGE0OhFXQ4GOPbK4rM n/T0JfxsqI2PbaaHGkqw+Odln2G+35y3WUT2uv0JtBt7ybOkxGhfJ7YNgiqV8jQ/ WiBVy6WvK0RFNAFCSxVjjppGVLzzlW1mYwt+eMeUjNkfahIWBjPv/RvV4zKQYRkz lHcd5ifRkBfGTgT9/+qWtQAE2M5TBupfdOfGrzU5z5TmQMHJp4WwmCq4arnhh04B U5CMCt+JDIwx9zxeJUA==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28240.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--0.531-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--0.531-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28240.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--0.530900-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: KR14mG59J57kht9v6t8rY5cNXassvvVBl1jd+fHBetMxkLdkW7C5qk7H fnB/xfeqpFedpgCFxaWVwYsOzT+AiQQdVwAJc8lZEclbAMYYY6x2vmZHwgFlDPGK4tc0Zt+oumG PyssTMbUhbOahTKQ9CMR69WiuSmmVJ3mwEy28e7uz8d6zvo5NkEVpfQZdETzWRZrOmBLNtw8bs0 xQdurQ4fiEwSHdlUJpepi+JVYshcqHdRPQsQpSrPi9hrAKwILa70GLyvzOg0xzCf+k3FFFBDYqM vkP1dQU6QigdfhQUnGRk6XtYogiarQ/aqQZTRfKU6baA36eiazEQdG7H66TyKsQd9qPXhnJPyYq 9XVuI6CRpBOpKpTArSo/tA/NYw7fkHpcDfmR4LyFEpIZeqE9FA==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/6JbNUFhFz_lWEr1sRCtq0HpBh1w>
Subject: [mpls] For Review: Proposed Liaison Response to SG11
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:37:20 -0000
Hi WG, You may have seen some back and forth on the list with respect to a liaison statement sent "For Information" to the OPSAWG by ITU-T Study Group 11. Watching the mailing list, your chairs thought it would be a good idea to send a response even though one is not requested or required, and even though we were not the original recipients of the incoming liaison. Our draft is below. We would welcome any thoughts or edits. The intention is to send this "soon" so it would help if you could respond in a timely way. Thanks, Adrian for the MPLS Chairs === To: ITU-T-SG-11 Cc: Denis Andreev <denis.andreev@itu.int>; Tatiana Kurakova <tatiana.kurakova@itu.int>; Scott Mansfield <Scott.Mansfield@Ericsson.com>; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org; itu-t-liaison@iab.org Purpose: For Information In response to: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1869/ Subject: Response to your Liaison Statement - LS on the consent of draft Recommendation ITU-T Q.3962 (ex. Q.joint_tr) "Requirements and Reference Model for optimized traceroute of joint Internet Protocol/Multi-Protocol Label Switching" Body: Thank you for your Liaison Statement - LS on the consent of draft Recommendation ITU-T Q.3962 (ex. Q.joint_tr) "Requirements and Reference Model for optimized traceroute of joint Internet Protocol/Multi-Protocol Label Switching" dated 2023-10-24. This has been passed on to the MPLS working group for consideration. The MPLS working group would like to thank you for sharing your requirements as expressed in Q.3962. Our current understanding of your requirements suggests that all or most of your requirements can be addressed using existing IP/MPLS OAM tools. We would welcome all experts to bring these requirements to the IETF's MPLS working group with a view to working collaboratively on an Informational RFC that describes how to deliver the function you want to see. Obviously, should any lacunae be discovered during this process, the working group would also be pleased to engage in additional protocol work to resolve any issues. Kind regards, Adrian Farrel MPLS Working Group Co-Chair On behalf of the MPLS Working Group and Co-Chairs
- [mpls] For Review: Proposed Liaison Response to S… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] For Review: Proposed Liaison Response … BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [mpls] For Review: Proposed Liaison Response … loa
- Re: [mpls] For Review: Proposed Liaison Response … Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] For Review: Proposed Liaison Response … Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] [EXTERNAL] Re: For Review: Proposed Li… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] For Review: Proposed Liaison Response … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] [EXTERNAL] RE: For Review: Proposed Li… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] For Review: Proposed Liaison Response … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] [OPSAWG] Proposed Liaison Response to … Michael Richardson
- Re: [mpls] For Review: Proposed Liaison Response … Dongjie (Jimmy)
- [mpls] Updated: Proposed Liaison Response to SG11 Adrian Farrel